WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.1K

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

You seem confused. I didn't say empirically.

in a way that is not influenced by personal feelings or opinions.

My assessment remains accurate.

[–] 0 pt

although your subjective view of things might be a correct representation of the things you see, it is still only your subjective point of view as composed to an objective statement which would be provable and scientifically reproducable.

Empirical would apply to me questioning whether your subjective view is wrong or not, yet i dont question that, as my own empirical subjective view also makes me feel like objectively such comments become more and more prevalent.

Yet i do not count how often actually i encounter them, and i have to assume bias by influencing the comments i encounter by influencing what channels i follow.

An objective assesment would be something that counts the actual number of such comments being made, not just the number of comments you yourself see.

Get it now?

[–] 0 pt

Perhaps it's not a good look to attempt to correct someone using the wrong definition. There is no variation of this which is a good look for you.

My point was made and remains accurate. You can reject or accept it, but that requires no interaction with me.

[–] 2 pts

Gosh Darn it, who would have thought that these words who sound so very similar in my language are actually used differently in my language, so yes empirical would have been the appropriate term to use.

In German subjektiv means a personal Perpective

objektiv means a global, reproducable Perspective

which english word would then be the correct term to use for a global, reproducable perspective?