WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

937

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

What else was he supposed to do? Kill them all? He wasn't an evil man.

I have a hard time with this because there are like two histories going on at the same time.

To your knowledge, in short, what was the timeline and motive for the actions between ww1 and ww2? Because we both know the history books aren't right.

[–] 0 pt

and because he was not an "evil"(morals are relative) man he was a zionist, im not saying he was wrong, im simply saying he wanted the jews to have their own country and made a deal with them which would help accomplish both groups goals, he wanted them out of germany, they wanted their own country, everyone won but germany lost because hitler also stopped the global financiers from being able to cash in on german prosperity(Churchill is quoted to that effect too, its not a secret)

in short the german people where effectively becoming slaves to money with an increasing cost of living and decreasing quality of life, they had to resort to more and more depraved and demeaning acts, people started to notice just like they are doing today, eventually they revolted,

[–] 0 pt

This still doesn't make any sense because he was the catalyst for the German people being free of debt and thriving.

He removed the dollar being backed by the Jew bankers and created his own labour backed currency.

Are you implying he was the creator of both the problem and the solution?

[–] 0 pt (edited )

im not implying anything

im stating that he wanted the jews out of germany and as a means of doing that agreed to give them a homeland elseware, hence him being a zionist, that is simply a statement of historical fact, he repatriated over 60,000 jews to israel