Well, either they are retracted because they are incorrect or because they were caught lying.
It is important to still have access and to know which is which.
Archive: https://archive.today/P1lyR
From the post:
>The shift from paywalled to open-access scientific publishing is progressing, driven in part by platforms like Sci-Hub -- a website that allows users to upload PDFs of published papers and share them with anyone. While the shadow library website has faced ongoing attempts by publishers to block access, it has another problem: the platform features many outdated or retracted papers that could spread misinformation or flawed findings. Ars Technica reports:
Well, either they are retracted because they are incorrect or because they were caught lying.
It is important to still have access and to know which is which.
Archive: https://archive.today/P1lyR
From the post:
>>The shift from paywalled to open-access scientific publishing is progressing, driven in part by platforms like Sci-Hub -- a website that allows users to upload PDFs of published papers and share them with anyone. While the shadow library website has faced ongoing attempts by publishers to block access, it has another problem: the platform features many outdated or retracted papers that could spread misinformation or flawed findings. Ars Technica reports: