Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] • 5 pts 2y

Right. And where is your theory, Tesla? And where are your mathematics to back it up? You won't answer me, will you? Don't give me the "I'm dead" excuse, I've heard that one before.

[–] • 8 pts 2y

Relativity isn't Einstein's either, since he was a rank plagiarist kike.

[–] • 6 pts 2y (edited 2y)

So I’m pretty fascinated with the study of physics. The way mathematics is able to explain gravity, motion, time, all of it.

But the further I delve and the more I learn, the harder it is to ignore how many errors, corrections, and assumptions there actually are that are just supposed to be accepted.

Einstein’s relativity fully explains the shape and the orbits/motions of planets and galaxies, until we realized that we can observe galaxies that are so far away that the light they emit couldn’t have existed yet at the time the Big Bang should have happened.

“Whoops, guess there’s dark energy pushing everything apart faster than the speed of light. We can’t define it or measure it, but it must exist within the theory of relativity for these observations to be true.”

Or until we find out that particles don’t behave in a way that fits the model.

“Whoops, guess there’s quantum relativity, and a lot of it is just random or changes depending on whether or not it’s being observed.”

I’m not someone who thinks space is fake or the earth is flat or the creation story is true, and I obviously understand that our understanding of science evolves as we learn more, but there is actually quite a lot that is easily observable that doesn’t fit with Einstein’s theory of relativity yet we all are still expected to just agree that it’s correct

[–] • 4 pts 2y

I obviously understand that our understanding of science evolves as we learn more

The nature of our understanding of reality itself evolves.

This is why when new true discoveries are found that are disparate from the most commonly held understandings of reality there is violent backlash against the bringer of this new understanding. There are many examples of this.

[–] • 2 pts 2y

I guess I’m trying to say that, from my perspective, there are enough “modifications” that we simply have to accept even if we don’t understand them that it’s worth questioning the validity of the full model itself. If Einstein’s equations only work in 60% of known situations while the other 40% just have to have an unknown “variable” that must exist even if we can’t measure it, I can be on board with questioning his theories as a whole

[–] • 4 pts 2y

that our understanding of science evolves

Not when it comes to covid vaccines!

[–] • 1 pt 2y

are you talking abut the Methusala star? Because their is plenty of reasons those age projections could be off / skewed.

[–] • 0 pt 2y

Not specifically. We see galaxies that are 40 billion light years away when they couldn’t have existed 15 billion years ago. Einstein’s theory of general relativity was working perfectly fine until we made that realization, then all of a sudden there’s a dark energy that expands space faster than the speed of light. We can’t measure it or observe it but we just accept that it must exist because it’s the only way our current model can exist, rather that questioning whether the current model is accurate at all

[–] • 5 pts 2y

Well where's Einstein's for that matter? That jew pedo never had an original thought in his life. His so-called quote-unquote "brilliance" was entirely a creation of the jew press at the time. Everything he ever published was cribbed from one of his contemporaries without any attribution and whenever he got called on it, he'd just clam up and not answer because he knew he was covered. He'd publish someone else's work knowing that his co-religionists in the press would make sure that his version got the headlines and the original White physicists who actually put in the work would go mostly unremembered. Like everything else a jew ever got, it was stolen from better Men than himself.

[–] • 1 pt 2y

We know you vote Mr Tesla, don't be so quiet!

[–] • 1 pt 2y

Turn out Tesla was correct. Einstein relativity was wrong. As for Teslas theories, the FBI raided his hotel room and safe at his death and took all his research papers. We are just now rediscovering global magnetic field power systems. A technology that was stolen a hundred years ago. Those UAPs in the news are Tesla vehicles controlled by the US CIA.

[–] • 0 pt 2y

Which part of relativity was wrong?

[–] • 1 pt 2y

Renormalization(medium.com)

[–] • 4 pts 2y

Of course. The theories were stolen by the jew einstein and modified with judaism. It's all fully documented.

[–] • 3 pts 2y

The common misconception is that Einstein simply stole Lorentz-Fitzgerald Contraction and rewrote it into his own theory of special relativity. But that's not true. LFC was postulated after Michelson-Morley failed to find any difference in light speed to account for Earth's motion through a stationary ether. This older theory differed from relativity in that it adhered to the concept of a stationary ether. It had that light speed was not constant relative to a moving observer. It explained the experimentally verified constant speed of light as a measurement error in the apparatus caused by a contraction of its own length in its direction of motion relative to the universal ether.

Special Relativity broke from this by assuming light speed is constant as measured. Then relative motion results in time dialation. Length contraction still occurs, but it is relative to the observer rather than universal like in LFC. Relative length contraction doesn't work without time dialation. Time was the key ingredient missing in previous theories. This was Einstein's contribution: time.

So if not Lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction, what did Einstein steal?

[–] • 0 pt 2y

I'm not arguing (((this))) with anyone. It's well known that the jew einstein added NOTHING to what he stole. It's well known he stole it, as it's also well known he had no formal higher education or intelligence. He was a low IQ patent clerk.

[–] • 2 pts 2y

Anyone have the full article or magazine from that date? I think it was the Feb. 9th, 1935 magazine.

[–] • 0 pt 2y

Curious. Where did you get feb 9?

There's a feb 4 and a feb 11

[–] • 0 pt 2y

I guess my search wasn’t correct. I’ll have to look it up. I wonder what issue it was.

[–] • 0 pt 2y (edited 2y)

If this quote is real, I doubt either man appeared on the cover. (I've perused 6 months worth but rest of year not available to me.)

Leaning toward quote is fake.

Edit: another reference online says new york times 1935, not time magazine

[–] • 1 pt 2y

Never in a million years would I believe that some jewish maggot came up with ideas and theories that are clearly too much for its rotten mush of a reptilian brain to handle. Stealing and perverting the truth in order to ruin scientific research for centuries to come though? Now that's an idea.

[–] • 1 pt 2y

I only heard Einstein comment on Tesla. When asked "How does it feel to be the smartest man alive?" He answered, "Ask Nikola Tesla."

[–] • 0 pt 2y

Tesla was wrong, though, and Einstein was right. Unsure why this quote, which shows Tesla was quite ignorant when it came to astrophysics, is important. He was brilliant in different ways but astrophysics was not his area of expertise.