![Guide to the different ways people deny science and scientific consensus. [960x960 - 78KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/Fd5wG1.jpg){kind=link}
Oh ok I see what you mean now. I agree modeling is a good tool to have some projective ideas checked but should not be touted as gospel or infallible.
Oh ok I see what you mean now. I agree modeling is a good tool to have some projective ideas checked but should not be touted as gospel or infallible.
It sort of fits in under experts, but you also have to throw all data modeling in there. If it isn't done correctly, your math, your data input, your method of gathering data, output parameters, and so on can all skew a result.
Not to mention certain lines of scientific inquiry just aren't allowed anymore.
It sort of fits in under experts, but you also have to throw all data modeling in there. If it isn't done correctly, your math, your data input, your method of gathering data, output parameters, and so on can all skew a result.
Not to mention certain lines of scientific inquiry just aren't allowed anymore.
(post is archived)