So provide one then, ya cunt
https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/safety-availability-biologics/thimerosal-and-vaccines
A vaccine containing 0.01% thimerosal as a preservative contains 50 micrograms of thimerosal per 0.5 mL dose or approximately 25 micrograms of mercury per 0.5 mL dose. For comparison, this is roughly the same amount of elemental mercury contained in a 3 ounce can of tuna fish.
There are plenty of good reasons to be skeptical of vaccines, but the mercury content isn't one of them. It's important to focus on the good reasons that are well supported by reason an evidence rather than the ones which aren't. It's similar to how raising concerns about government overreach is best done via using good reasons (abuse of power, oppression, cost, etc) rather than screeching about unsupported reasons like "THEY'RE ALL REPTILIANS". ;)
HAHAHAHA the FDA, go choke on a jew dick, vaxtard shill.
A vaccine containing 0.01% thimerosal as a preservative contains 50 micrograms of thimerosal per 0.5 mL dose or approximately 25 micrograms of mercury per 0.5 mL dose. For comparison, this is roughly the same amount of elemental mercury contained in a 3 ounce can of tuna fish.
This is a retard argument. Eating tuna is not the same as injecting mercury, for fuck's sake. Only retards think this is a good argument.
mercury-based preservative thimerosal to conceal its causative link to a suite of brain injuries, including autism
The Danish Study of 650,000 children already proved this was nonsense.
Hes saying provide a counter argument you dumb cunt. By your own logic, that is. Hes not saying provide us with details about how much mercury is in tuna. Nobody challenged you on the veracity of the stated quantities.
This is akin to advocating for an injection of pesticides, parasites, and microplastics (bypassing natural defenses) merely because we tend to injest them.
(post is archived)