WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

229

https://nationalvanguard.org/2011/12/the-jewish-bias-of-the-nobel-prize/

"calculations were performed on data for the 1901-1940 and 1941-2010 periods.

A radical change occurred immediately after the Second World War. The number of laureates exploded and Prize-sharing became the norm. This change is often described as the “inflation” of the Prize. It is explained by the acceleration of research and the fact that most scientific work is done by teams today, which makes it unfair to honor only one person. Research redundancy – parallel research and problem solving – is also a contributing factor. Jewish-Gentile Prize sharing grew from a shy ~2.7% to a bold ~24.6% (~9-fold increase). About 10% of Prizes have remained “Jewish only” but the proportion of “Gentile only” Prizes decreased as “J-G shared” Prizes became more frequent. In other words, Jewish scientists more than doubled their share of the available laureate positions because the Gentile share of the “Nobel-cake” declined (Figure 2). The proportion of Jewish laureates grow from 9.4% to 22.2% after the Second World War (p=0.005, n=5) and the percentage of Gentile Prizes dropped correspondingly. (Economics Prizes were excluded from this calculation; they did not exist before 1969.)"

https://nationalvanguard.org/2011/12/the-jewish-bias-of-the-nobel-prize/ "calculations were performed on data for the 1901-1940 and 1941-2010 periods. A radical change occurred immediately after the Second World War. The number of laureates exploded and Prize-sharing became the norm. This change is often described as the “inflation” of the Prize. It is explained by the acceleration of research and the fact that most scientific work is done by teams today, which makes it unfair to honor only one person. Research redundancy – parallel research and problem solving – is also a contributing factor. Jewish-Gentile Prize sharing grew from a shy ~2.7% to a bold ~24.6% (~9-fold increase). About 10% of Prizes have remained “Jewish only” but the proportion of “Gentile only” Prizes decreased as “J-G shared” Prizes became more frequent. In other words, Jewish scientists more than doubled their share of the available laureate positions because the Gentile share of the “Nobel-cake” declined (Figure 2). The proportion of Jewish laureates grow from 9.4% to 22.2% after the Second World War (p=0.005, n=5) and the percentage of Gentile Prizes dropped correspondingly. (Economics Prizes were excluded from this calculation; they did not exist before 1969.)"

(post is archived)

[–] 5 pts

The only thing they excell at is- con artistry. They got everybody fooled and bought off

[–] 2 pts

and they decide who gets award.

[–] 2 pts

All part of their push to create einstein as a celebrity scientist. In turn providing the cloak of legitimacy.

Truth is semites are below average IQ. Ashkenazi have pretty typical European IQs. Statistically they should have the same rates as Europeans. Anything else implies bias or some type of social filter (leftists only hire leftists and so on).

[–] 2 pts

Thank you for bringing up Einstein and saying this because you make a great point.

[–] 2 pts

Ya, einstein was cool for taking credit of other scientists when he wasn't even on a team. He was a real trend setter.

He's a admitted plagiarist but for some reason doesn't matter because you're an antisemite and his celebrity status means ethics and standards don't apply.

[–] 5 pts

I understand he worked at a Patent office and that gave him all types of access to plagiarize others work.

[–] 0 pt

Jews basically took over the world after WWII.

[–] 0 pt

Yes.

In fact they were in control before it and got all nations to combine against Germany which was getting out from under their control.

How else can we explain a jewish communist soviet union combining with a jewish capitalist Franklin Roosevelt combining against a fellow European country that was escaping jewish control.

[–] 0 pt

Culture of Critique should be required reading in all public high schools. Sooner for the smart ones

[–] 0 pt

well the first one was 1901.. so basic math says there will be more after the war

That's not what OP said or implied. The jew bias started after World War II.

>"calculations were performed on data for the 1901-1940 and 1941-2010 periods.