No doubt you'll get NPC fuckers who say "but it clearly shows more people who are unjabbed are getting sick!!!! You're ignorant!!!"
There are actually more up to date numbers which you can find here: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1012644/Technical_Briefing_21.pdf
Using these numbers, the dead to infected ratio for the fully jabbed is 4.34x worse than the ratio for the unjabbed. However I wouldn't look at this number as it varies greatly on the age demographic. Lumping in the > 50 year olds in with the 50 or younger crowd heavily skews the numbers. You're better off looking at the age breakdown instead, as evidenced below.
According to these numbers, for the age group of 50 and below, the fully jabbed had a 65% HIGHER rate of death compared to the unjabbed! However it's almost the complete opposite for the older than 50 group as the jabbed group has a nearly 70% lower fatality rate than the unjabbed.
You can conclude that those 50 and younger should definitely avoid it, and maybe those above 50 might consider it. Personally I don't think anyone should take it no matter their age as treatment does exist (i.e. ivermectin) and we still have no idea what the long term side effects of these shots are.
I'm also still not fully satisfied with the data provided as we really need more granular age demographic breakdowns. Increments of 10 years would be nice as I've noticed that for data sets that do have more detailed age categories the overall fatality rates increase significantly beyond 60. Also, data on comorbidities would be a lot more insightful, especially on whether or not the patients are obese. I can't remember where I read it but this one study concluded that obesity alone will triple the risk of dying from the coof. I guess they don't want us thinking folk to get the info we need to completely destroy their narratives now do they?
Fantastic if it kills off the Millenials, the Boomers are dead soon regardless.
Hate to break it to you, but everyone has a 100% chance of dying, vaxxed or unvaxxed.
So many idiots on here consistently missing points and/or have the reading comprehension of a 12 year old nigger.
Sounds like there are some idiots on here who just want to play along with the jew narrative that we need to take sides and fight each other over their plandemic.
Of course you would revert to that. “I got special news for you guyz, we’re alp gonna die one dayyy.”
Stfu.
So.. the premise is that the un-vaxxed are 5x more likely to be immortal?
Sheeeeeit..
-411% Efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in UK to prevent death of patients seeking treatment.
The unvaccinated people must have died on the way to hospital otherwise the vaccine efficacy would look way better.
Try it yourself!
Ok I am going to chime in here after multiple terms studying both probability and statistics. This is junk until it's put up against a control group. In order to determine vaccine efficacy, you need to know the number of vaccinated in the general population otherwise these numbers don't mean much. It's 5 am and I have no interest in pursuing the math.
This headline demonstrates how terrible most people are at statistics. :
~42,000,000 UK vaccinated ~24,650,000 UK unvaccinated
Probability of dying from Covid in the UK if you're vaccinated: 402 / 42,000,000 = 0.001% Probability of dying from Covid in the UK if you're unvaccinated: 253 / 24,650,000 = 0.001%
The risk is the same, not greater.
Are you looking at Table 5 on page 18/19?
If so you are a fucking idiot.
402/742 = .54 (54%) "Of the 742 that died within 28 days after a positive covid test result, 402 (54%) were vaccinated with 2 doses"
253/742 = .34 (34%) "Of the 742 that died within 28 days after a positive covid test, 34% were unvaccinated"
And most of those fuckers in the sample for that scenario are over age 50 670/742 =.90 (90%)
The total sample size of vaccinated delta cases was 47,008, so 402/47,008 = .008 (.08%) of the 47,008 vaccinated delta cases died.
Or 253 of 151,054 unvaccinated delta cases died (.01%)
I think that's 8x more likely to die...so the title would be "vaccinated delta cases in an emergency care unit are 8x more likely to die"
1 out of every 125 vaccinated delta cases in an emergency care unit will die.
1 out of every 1,000 unvaccinated delta case in an emergency care unit will die.
1,000/125 = 8x
You don't just take that 402 and 253 and apply it to the whole population dipshit. Not all 42,000,000 vaccinated European kikes are delta cases dying at a emergency care unit within 28 days after a positive covid test.
TLDR; The article is right and both of you suck at math.
The comparison is of Infection fatality rates between the vaccinated and unvaccinated. IFR is [number of deaths] / [number of people in that group] The multiplication factor of two number is determined by division. ( I can't believe I actually have to say this ...)
e.g. 100 / 20 = 5
In other words 20 is 1/5th of 100 or 100 is 5x 20
Let's put it all together.....
IFR rates
Comparison
In other words you are 5.11 times more likely to die with the vaccine.
You don't just take that 402 and 253 and apply it to the whole population dipshit.
Dipshit, that's exactly how you calculate risk.
So you think 42,000,000 vaccinated people in the UK test positive for the delta variant and are sitting in an emergency care unit right now?
uk numbers have it at 8x more likely
Does that mean that the variant or strains are becoming more deadly to people that wanted nothing to do with the clotshot?
(post is archived)