I argue there's no difference. The quantum level is statistical probability because the events are too quick to perceive otherwise.
Quantum theory is also non-communitative which means it's more accurate to deal with proportions than using linear metric measurments.
Perceived by who?
Statistical probability depends on number vales, but number values are just a form of measurement. If you reduce or increase the amount that number values represent, you essentially change the level of perception. So if you break the numbers down small enough, the probabilities become less certain because the statistics are different in small but more noticeable ways.
At the quantum level, potentials determine outcomes. What causes those potentials to shift? Can mind at the macro level affect the potential of an experiment? It's been shown time and again that they can and do.
Time and space are just forms of measurement. Breaking them down into smaller and smaller quantities leads to Planck's Law, where Planck's time and Planck's length define the smallest possible quantities of each. Beyond that, classical physics breaks down and quantum physics come into play. A world determined only by potentials. New forms of determination are required. New characteristics of matter arise. Action at a distance becomes possible, based on entanglement. How do particles that are entangled know what each other are doing when they are miles apart?
Let's get deep like no feeling on the skin from the frost, from being cold hearted like a villainous boss.
Quantum means discreet quantity, a step. How do you measure that step? By observing a change in the energy of the system.
Our fundamental understanding of energy creates the understanding of quantum theory.
Because our measurement devices are limited we have to infer the probability of an energy step change.
If you have a ball on a tether and you are blind it is hard to hit the ball as it's spinning on the tether. Because you can't see it, you're missing information, your perception is incomplete.
Quantum mechanics is estimating where the ball is so you can hit it, even though you lack most but not all senses.
When a random number generator shows a significant change in its randomness after a significant event occurs that plays on many minds, like 9/11 for instance, and this sort of change continually occurs soon after significant events occur, there is indication that our minds are attached to the world around us and have a small but perceptible effect on it.
We are more aware of things at a deeper level than we are conscious of. Potentials are based on intention/expectation. We can never know something unless enough of us believe it exists or at least can imagine it and we go looking for it. Belief and imagination are grounded in a system of logic that is shared by those who partake in an experience. The universe and our ability to share it requires this. Subsets of reality can involve beliefs/expectations/intentions that those not involved do not hold. Planets in our solar system came into being out of necessity to comply with the theories. They were imagined first, then looked for and finally discovered. The blind man can learn to hit the ball when he learns to use other logic systems than that required in the use of sight.
Perceived by who
Um the observer.
Action at a distance becomes possible, based on entanglement. How do particles that are entangled know what each other are doing when they are miles apart?
Awareness seems to transcend time and space. This seems to be true at all scales. Seems to.
(post is archived)