WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

777

(post is archived)

[–] 6 pts

Why are these articles written like a female teacher taking to her grade-school students?

And what's wrong with just exploring the topic without some stupid new-agey agenda of showing that everything is alive and aware? Consciousness means something. It's not present in many things because we can precisely describe their behavior with simple mathematical models.

[–] 1 pt

Why are these articles written like a female teacher taking to her grade-school students?

They write for niggers and jews. That's why.

[–] 1 pt

That's the most popular response on this site. Applied to just about everything and simplistic as fuck.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

troof Can't accept the truth.

:)

e; Also;

... simplistic as fuck.

Occam's razor.

[–] 1 pt

Pop Mech targets an IQ of 110.

Anyone above 115 knows not to bother, so they aim left on word choice.

[–] 1 pt

Why are these articles written like a female teacher taking to her grade-school students?

It's an established propaganda tactic. It targets a certain subset of the populace and panders to their way of thinking/emoting about the world.

stupid new-agey agenda

That's been the drive of modern science for decades now.

It's pop mechanics, emphasis on the pop. Like pop music it is vapid, devoid of meaningful content.

[–] 0 pt

How does matter react with other matter? If matter isn't aware then how does matter interact?

[–] 0 pt

Consciousness/self-awareness.

Physics is incomprehensible at its core. But if you accept the basic abstract qualities, you can understand it mechanistically. That two things react a certain way when close enough doesn't imply anything like consciousness or self-awareness. Again, it becomes meaningless to define all interaction as awareness.

[–] 0 pt

Why? If it is accurate?

[–] 0 pt

How can you be self-aware without something to measure yourself against?

[–] 0 pt

It's not present in many things because we can precisely describe their behavior with simple mathematical models.

So you believe that the act of explaining something negates whatever consciousness exists within it?

Mathematical models are limited descriptions that only deal with observable/known/theorized factors. They used to think they had everything figured out when they first theorized atomic nature. Then quantum factors came along...