Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

722

In terms of academia, a source like Nature is considered La Creme de la Creme. If you can pick apart an academics argument using Nature as a reference then you've pretty much knocked a leg off of their 3 legged soap box.

The second exercise is understanding the terminology. Nature is good with terminology and reading it can sometimes be an exercise in understanding technobabble. You've got time, read it carefully and any expressions you don't understand look them up. If you are part of the master race then this is not above your intellect, but you may have to break down the expressions to make them more digestible. If you're finding it too hard to read then get gud scrub.

So, pop quiz: Based on current events and reading this review, tell me what issue you can spot from it. (Hint, it's mentioned in the introduction and and based around time periods.)

In terms of academia, a source like **Nature** is considered La Creme de la Creme. If you can pick apart an academics argument using Nature as a reference then you've pretty much knocked a leg off of their 3 legged soap box. The second exercise is understanding the terminology. Nature is good with terminology and reading it can sometimes be an exercise in understanding technobabble. You've got time, read it carefully and any expressions you don't understand look them up. If you are part of `the master race` then this is not above your intellect, but you may have to break down the expressions to make them more digestible. If you're finding it too hard to read then `get gud scrub`. So, pop quiz: Based on current events and reading this review, tell me what issue you can spot from it. (Hint, it's mentioned in the introduction and and based around time periods.)

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (55).
[–] • 0 pt (edited )

There's still plenty we are unsure of but based on what you're saying, which I agree with to an extent, what is different between receiving the S protein via viral vector or live-attenuated virus vs natural contraction?

If what we are seeing from the vaccines is a reaction to an isolated version of the same Spike protein found in wild-type, then the wild-type reactions are significantly higher than vaccination. Long-COVID as a result of the toxicity of the Spike proteins would be similar to Long-Vaccine of the mechanisms are the same.

If you want to read more on the actual S protein selected and why AZ has 10x more clotting issues than JnJ, check out this research:

https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-558954/v1

Noteworthy, the vaccine from Johnson & Johnson appears to carry fewer splice donor sequences, especially SD506 and SD3614 (see Table 1B and 1C), which are the strongest predicted splice donor sites in the AZD1222 sequence (see Fig. 1A). This may explain the ~ 10-fold lower incidence of severe side effects with the Johnson & Johnson vaccine when compared to the AZD1222 vaccine.

[–] • 0 pt

what is different between receiving the S protein via viral vector or live-attenuated virus vs natural contraction?

The vaccine is putting that shit straight in to your skin, muscle, blood and lymph fluid. With the wild form, you have your respiratory tract filtering out some of that crap, which is what its designed to do. Youre body starts an immune response which is able to suppress viral replication by the time it gets in to your blood stream. Especially if you are young. And obviously smart people have their tube of ivermectin ready to go if they get symptoms. Early ivermectin should be able to prevent the vascular tissue from being infected.

Also do we have any idea what the spike protein “load” is in the blood vs in a moderate case of wild covid? Maybe the whole virus is more damageing in similar quantities but there’s 100x more spike protein in your blood compared to a moderate case of covid.

If Im right about the spike protein plugging in to ace2 receptors and infecting cells, then ivermectin should help with vaccine side effects. I need a guinea pig. I also think maybe Pepsid should work.

Also check out what I was discussing with thistle about the dsRNA.

Extracellular naked RNA has been shown to increase the permeability of tightly packed endothelial cells and may thus contribute to oedema169. Another study showed that extracellular RNA promoted blood coagulation and pathological thrombus formation

Lookie: https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/104/15/6388.full.pdf

Basically some dsRNA that gets mixed in with the mRNA during production could cause increased inflamation including clotting and could promote autoimmunity while triggering a RNA degradation process that would destroy the “good” mRNA. Or something.

[–] • 0 pt

I too suspect that ivermectin should help with the side effects. Need to find someone willing to try it or maybe Dr. Kory would have an answer on that.