Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

In terms of academia, a source like Nature is considered La Creme de la Creme. If you can pick apart an academics argument using Nature as a reference then you've pretty much knocked a leg off of their 3 legged soap box.

The second exercise is understanding the terminology. Nature is good with terminology and reading it can sometimes be an exercise in understanding technobabble. You've got time, read it carefully and any expressions you don't understand look them up. If you are part of the master race then this is not above your intellect, but you may have to break down the expressions to make them more digestible. If you're finding it too hard to read then get gud scrub.

So, pop quiz: Based on current events and reading this review, tell me what issue you can spot from it. (Hint, it's mentioned in the introduction and and based around time periods.)

In terms of academia, a source like **Nature** is considered La Creme de la Creme. If you can pick apart an academics argument using Nature as a reference then you've pretty much knocked a leg off of their 3 legged soap box. The second exercise is understanding the terminology. Nature is good with terminology and reading it can sometimes be an exercise in understanding technobabble. You've got time, read it carefully and any expressions you don't understand look them up. If you are part of `the master race` then this is not above your intellect, but you may have to break down the expressions to make them more digestible. If you're finding it too hard to read then `get gud scrub`. So, pop quiz: Based on current events and reading this review, tell me what issue you can spot from it. (Hint, it's mentioned in the introduction and and based around time periods.)

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (55).
[–] • 1 pt

I'm not saying I trust it, I'm saying if the kikes come at you with the needles your greatest defence is to be informed and to philosophically deny them.

[–] • 2 pts

Assuming you're in burgerland your greatest defense is and always has been 2A.

[–] • 0 pt

I get your point, but to think appealing to logic will stop fanatically irrational cult followers from obeying orders is a bit naive. Still a great idea to read their actual scriptures, but just because someone gets sick at the sight of weaponized rhetoric, doesn’t mean they’re to dumb to understand the point.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

It depends. You're not really fighting the person coming at you with the needle, you're fighting the people who are just standing there watching them come at you with the needle.

If you win those people then they'll have your back.

If you argue from an informed position that makes sense to them then you start to win, to put it in maga terms. If you start babbling random words in hopes of sounding intelligent then they're going to take you to be the fool you sound.