Didn’t the AZ viral vector vax just kill a blond 30 something BBC presenter yesterday?
You know what the problem is? Its the spike.
I'm for the use of Ivermectin and the MATH+ protocol of treatment instead of vaccinations and I'm prefacing this so you can understand that my perspective is one of reason.
It's not the Spike. Thrombocytopenia is more likely to occur in women taking birth control and as a reaction from the contraceptive itself than the viral vector vaccine. The Spike is not the problem and the problem at the same time because you have to understand a few aspects about this:
The S(pike) protein is the best protein from a virus to isolate for the usage of a vaccine in comparison to other proteins found such as the N protein.
The S protein is just one component of the overall virus and the other aspects of the virus also influence it's pathology on the body.
The S protein that is being used in the viral vectors such as Sputnik and Janssen is one that was particular selected for it's ability for the body to deal with it due to the folds and physical properties of the protein.
The S protein in the viral vector vaccine is the same S protein from the virus itself, meaning your body's reaction to it will be as if you're reacting to the S protein of the actual virus.
Without the other proteins the resulting impact on your body is significantly less deadly but some people will still have reactions to it just as if they'd have a reaction to the virus itself and die.
Studies since SARS show that the viral vector S protein vaccines result in no immunopathology issues. The same can not be said about any other vaccine except live-attenuated so fuck mRNA vaccines and fuck big pharma.
It's not the Spike. Thrombocytopenia is more likely to occur in women
Why do you think these problems are unrelated I wonder?
The S(pike) protein is the best protein from a virus to isolate for the usage of a vaccine in comparison to other proteins found such as the N protein.
No debate.
The S protein that is being used in the viral vectors such as Sputnik and Janssen is one that was particular selected for it's ability for the body to deal with it due to the folds and physical properties of the protein.
I know nothing of this. Why is it different then the mRNA version?
There are clearly a significant number of problems reported with the AZ and the J&J vax as well as “trad vax” versions used by China and India. Same thing, clotting. You can say thrombocytopenia, its two sides of the same coin.
The vaccine is being absorbed by the vascular tissue which is then presenting the spike protein causeing an inflammatory immune response on the inside of your blood vessels. The thrombocytes get in on the act and start to induce clotting while simulataneous causing platelet count to drop.
Are the platelets themselves absorbing the vax and producing spike proteins? Probably. I don’t know if this works with the viral vector vax since platelets have no nucleus.
Anyway the spike proteins eventually are released in to the blood stream or lymph fluid and then can go on to “infect” additional cells. Tell me why this cant happen. This was an efficiently designed bioweapon with high affinity for ace2 receptor. Its going to invade any ace2 receptor it sees. The spike protein will continue to wreak havoc inside tissues with high ace2 expression as long as it lasts in sufficient quantities. Its going to behave just like the full virus in your body except for replication. Everything else is the same. Lone spike proteins are probably attacking the platelets as well. They have ace2 receptors.
I wouldn’t have believed it before but it seems as though the vaccinated are “infectious” with the spike protein and second hand exposure is resulting in croup type symptoms, asthma, eye irritation and rashes. A friend’s kid got croup 5 days after the friend was vaccinated. The media is trying to pawn this off as a resurgence of pink eye and hand foot and mouth disease. I kid you not. Hand foot and mouth disease is supposedly to blame for these kids getting rashes on and inside their mouths after mom got the jab. No fucking way.
People are complaining of vaccine arm, a severe rash that occurs one week after vax— spike protein not PEG
If this spike protein is so injurious to skin and epithelials that it causes second hand rashes and respiratory symtoms what’s it doing to the inside of your veins? That ain’t the neocapsid protein doing that.
Studies since SARS show that the viral vector S protein vaccines result in no immunopathology issues
Hog wash. Anytime you provoke an immune response it can go sideways. If it works its going to produce immunopathology some of the time.
Is the VV tech safer than the mRNA? Or the attenuated virus? We dont know because no one is collecting any unbiased data. I don’t trust anybody’s numbers at this point. I just know that all three approaches have killed people . Nobody has made a good case to me why one tech is safer.
But I cant think of any reasons why a few billion or trillion spike proteins wouldn’t wreak as much havoc as the whole virus other than their inability to replicate. It was built to fuck up human cells.
There's still plenty we are unsure of but based on what you're saying, which I agree with to an extent, what is different between receiving the S protein via viral vector or live-attenuated virus vs natural contraction?
If what we are seeing from the vaccines is a reaction to an isolated version of the same Spike protein found in wild-type, then the wild-type reactions are significantly higher than vaccination. Long-COVID as a result of the toxicity of the Spike proteins would be similar to Long-Vaccine of the mechanisms are the same.
If you want to read more on the actual S protein selected and why AZ has 10x more clotting issues than JnJ, check out this research:
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-558954/v1
Noteworthy, the vaccine from Johnson & Johnson appears to carry fewer splice donor sequences, especially SD506 and SD3614 (see Table 1B and 1C), which are the strongest predicted splice donor sites in the AZD1222 sequence (see Fig. 1A). This may explain the ~ 10-fold lower incidence of severe side effects with the Johnson & Johnson vaccine when compared to the AZD1222 vaccine.
(post is archived)