Meh. The fact of the matter is that . It's almost like 'scientists' find exactly what their funding wants them to find.
As far as creationism goes, intelligent design explains the world much better than random mutations do from an objective standpoint. Computers and cars didn't come about through random selection sequences, so why would it be that the most complex thing on earth, life itself, was just random chance.
Literally everything you just wrote is totally wrong. The least of which you misunderstood what your link is saying in order to justify your deep seated need to confirm that your religious views are correct.
That link wrote that 50% of all published papers cannot be replicated. What it did not say is that peer riview is complete garbage. What it actually said is this:
All humans lie all the time everywhere, and, it turns out that we just assumed that peer reviewed science was immune to this nature of the human species which was wrong.
Congratulations.
// EDIT: Re-read this, and it comes across too harsh. My apologies, that is my old athiest training.
In no logical context of my comment do I equate creationism with the article I linked. I made two distinct points, separated by a paragraph break. Your comment wasn't what I would call harsh, it was an illogical attempt to build up and tear down a straw man version of an argument I never made.
Your response reads as a knee jerk reaction to a world view which challenges your own religiously held belief against the existence of a Creator. It was a desperately flailing attempt to deny the obvious reality that things which you can touch and see existing are made manifest by the intelligent design of man. I believe it is no great leap to assume that, as intelligent design is an operable principle in practice (i.e. the intelligent design of a computer), it is likely that a 'being' beyond our comprehension created 'life' as we perceive it.
Fair enough.
Prove your creator exists.
All humans lie all the time everywhere, and, it turns out that we just assumed that peer reviewed science was immune to this nature of the human species which was wrong.
Boy isn’t that the truth. I really used to think scientists were just better people who had a monk like devotion to uncovering the objective truth! Now that idea seems incredibly naive to me. Scientists like nice things! They also love to please their peers and superiors! Its like they’re regular people or something!
intelligent design explains the world much better than random mutations do from an objective standpoint
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnsley_fern
that's a fern, made from a computer algorithm. that's one of the simplest examples of life whose physically form is basically inevitable
you are only seeing evolution as improbable because everything that "failed" is now dead. everything continues to evolve in reaction to its environment, even today new things evolve. We have a whole fossil record of each stage developing, if this was an "intelligent" process then somebody clearly wasted a few billion years in trying out stupid chimp prototypes first.
Computers and cars didn't come about through random selection sequences
yes they did in a way, lots of prototypes were tried first, anything that worked was improved further. You can create AI's that basically do random stuff until something works, and when it works it's then called "intelligent"
if you want to believe in sky pixies then whatever, but the same process could equally occur on an identical planet elsewhere in the universe, they are not required for anything to occur
Provide one example of speciation. I'll wait
Provide one example of speciation. I'll wait
which proves what? Darwin is only two hundred years old so we've been looking at this for barely a century, are you expecting something totally new to pop up on a planet now full of humans?
But we've seen how this works over millennia, dinosaurs had 'feathers', we now have birds, we can see examples of feather structures up and down the time line
Nobody believes in Creationism, it's in the same kind of box as flat earth BS. Trot out all the bitchute videos you want, its only even being talked about because people still cling to a sky pixie fantasy and want to build a reality to support their book, instead of just accepting that it was mostly yarns spun around a kernel of actual history It's about as real as niggers being Kangz and living in cities.
(post is archived)