In no logical context of my comment do I equate creationism with the article I linked. I made two distinct points, separated by a paragraph break. Your comment wasn't what I would call harsh, it was an illogical attempt to build up and tear down a straw man version of an argument I never made. Your response reads as a knee jerk reaction to a world view which challenges your own religiously held belief against the existence of a Creator. It was a desperately flailing attempt to deny the obvious reality that things which you can touch and see existing are made manifest by the intelligent design of man. I believe it is no great leap to assume that, as intelligent design is an operable principle in practice (i.e. the intelligent design of a computer), it is likely that a 'being' beyond our comprehension created 'life' as we perceive it.