WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

It's more likely that the router simply created additional heat in an enclosed environment that affected the growth.

It would be interesting to see additional studies though.

[–] 1 pt

Considering it's in essentially a Faraday cage it's not going to get any use, so likely not going to put off much heat either. Those things are passively cooled to begin with.

I'm more interested in seeing a comparison between 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands on the growth rates.

[–] 0 pt

Likely not the WiFi, but some other difference in conditions.

[–] 0 pt

Wifi and other wireless technology creates cellular stress. Imagine trying to do your homework or any job when there's a kid poking or shouting at you 24/7. Same mechanism.

[–] 3 pts

Yeh except the sun does the same, also background radiation.

Your body is built to repair itself constantly.

It only matters if you stop the repair process.

[–] 0 pt

If that was true we'd see this problem in every plant and tree growing anywhere there was WiFi or cellular signals. In other words, every city on the planet.

[–] 0 pt

It's the dose as well. Those little seeds were blasted with the WiFi antenna and it looks like the signals were contained in the little box increasing the dose further.

[–] -1 pt

This is what many people don't understand. They like to point out some dead bird found near a cell tower as proof of the "radiation" causing harm, but when I ask them why there aren't dead birds, trees, insects or plants around every cell tower, they start attacking me for pissing on their tinfoil hats. They really just want to live in fear as if being afraid is somehow virtuous. I think these are the same people who have enjoyed the forced jewflu lockdowns and authoritarian tyranny since it gives them a windmill to tilt at. Some people just thrive on fear it seems.