WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.5K

source: https://www.technocracy.news/dr-michael-yeadon-not-one-of-those-things-is-supported-by-the-science/

Author: Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a life science researcher and former vice-president and chief scientist of allergy and respiratory research at Pfizer

“Viruses are really tiny, and their business is to get as quickly as they can inside your cells. So, they bind to a receptor on the surface and inject themselves into your cell. So, they’re inside. Antibodies are big molecules and they’re generally outside your cells.

So just think about that for a moment. Antibodies and viruses are in separate compartments. The virus is inside the cell, the antibodies outside the cell. I’m not saying antibodies have no role, but they’re really not very important. This has been proven. There are some people in whom a natural experiment has occurred.

They have a defect and they actually don’t make antibodies, but they’re able to fight off COVID-19, the virus SARS-CoV-2, quite well. The way they do that is, they have T-cell immunity, cellular immunity. [T-cells] are cells that are trained to detect virus-infected cells and to kill those cells. That’s how you defend yourself against a virus.

So, all of these mentions of antibody levels, it’s just bunk. It is not a good measure of whether or not you’re immune. It does give evidence that you’ve been infected, but their persistence is not important as to whether you’ve got immunity …

We’ve known this for decades. We’ve known about T-cells for decades. They were clearly in my undergraduate textbooks. And we’ve known about their importance in defending you against respiratory viruses since probably the 1970s, certainly the 1980s. So, don’t believe anything where people suggest to you that their role is uncertain. We’ve known for a very long time that they are absolutely central.”

source: https://www.technocracy.news/dr-michael-yeadon-not-one-of-those-things-is-supported-by-the-science/ Author: Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a life science researcher and former vice-president and chief scientist of allergy and respiratory research at Pfizer >“Viruses are really tiny, and their business is to get as quickly as they can inside your cells. So, they bind to a receptor on the surface and inject themselves into your cell. So, they’re inside. Antibodies are big molecules and they’re generally outside your cells. > So just think about that for a moment. Antibodies and viruses are in separate compartments. The virus is inside the cell, the antibodies outside the cell. I’m not saying antibodies have no role, but they’re really not very important. This has been proven. There are some people in whom a natural experiment has occurred. > They have a defect and they actually don’t make antibodies, but they’re able to fight off COVID-19, the virus SARS-CoV-2, quite well. The way they do that is, they have T-cell immunity, cellular immunity. [T-cells] are cells that are trained to detect virus-infected cells and to kill those cells. That’s how you defend yourself against a virus. > So, all of these mentions of antibody levels, it’s just bunk. It is not a good measure of whether or not you’re immune. It does give evidence that you’ve been infected, but their persistence is not important as to whether you’ve got immunity … > We’ve known this for decades. We’ve known about T-cells for decades. They were clearly in my undergraduate textbooks. And we’ve known about their importance in defending you against respiratory viruses since probably the 1970s, certainly the 1980s. So, don’t believe anything where people suggest to you that their role is uncertain. We’ve known for a very long time that they are absolutely central.”

(post is archived)

[–] 6 pts

Anything they want it to. It's the biological equivalent of running an unknown executable on your computer.

[–] 1 pt

Presumably they engineered it to do something. It's certainly not a vaccine.

Nope. They are making it so women are no longer fertile and maybe even men. It's not just random, they have a plan and goal with this genetic engineering. Unless you really believe they are just fucking around to see what happens while spending all this time, money, and effort.

[–] 1 pt

Normal vaccine takes 10 years to develop. Weird this new one came up so fast and from so many companies and so many countries with their own original formulas. To serve your point...

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3821659/

alterations in the expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme-1, angiotensin-converting enzyme-2, and angiotensin-converting enzyme-3 might be one of the most important mechanisms underlying both female and male infertility.

The study plainly states that there are ACE2 receptors in the ovaries and testes and that blocking these receptors will possibly suspend oocyte meiosis and spermatogenesis.

there is no doubt that ACE1 and ACE2 have gained recognition as significant regulators of the physiology and pathology of the reproductive system.

Of course, all the relevant data is proprietary. You're not allowed to know what's in the vax beyond a few basic ingredients.

For all we know it could be a placebo, or a mix among different groups. Placebos, one vaccine that does A, one that does B, etc.

[–] 1 pt

That's pretty much what I'm saying. It could make people infertile, it could program someone's cells to make prions that kill them in ten years so they can just blame it on the meat industry. Pretty much anything.