WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

339

source: https://www.technocracy.news/dr-michael-yeadon-not-one-of-those-things-is-supported-by-the-science/

Author: Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a life science researcher and former vice-president and chief scientist of allergy and respiratory research at Pfizer

“Viruses are really tiny, and their business is to get as quickly as they can inside your cells. So, they bind to a receptor on the surface and inject themselves into your cell. So, they’re inside. Antibodies are big molecules and they’re generally outside your cells.

So just think about that for a moment. Antibodies and viruses are in separate compartments. The virus is inside the cell, the antibodies outside the cell. I’m not saying antibodies have no role, but they’re really not very important. This has been proven. There are some people in whom a natural experiment has occurred.

They have a defect and they actually don’t make antibodies, but they’re able to fight off COVID-19, the virus SARS-CoV-2, quite well. The way they do that is, they have T-cell immunity, cellular immunity. [T-cells] are cells that are trained to detect virus-infected cells and to kill those cells. That’s how you defend yourself against a virus.

So, all of these mentions of antibody levels, it’s just bunk. It is not a good measure of whether or not you’re immune. It does give evidence that you’ve been infected, but their persistence is not important as to whether you’ve got immunity …

We’ve known this for decades. We’ve known about T-cells for decades. They were clearly in my undergraduate textbooks. And we’ve known about their importance in defending you against respiratory viruses since probably the 1970s, certainly the 1980s. So, don’t believe anything where people suggest to you that their role is uncertain. We’ve known for a very long time that they are absolutely central.”

source: https://www.technocracy.news/dr-michael-yeadon-not-one-of-those-things-is-supported-by-the-science/ Author: Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a life science researcher and former vice-president and chief scientist of allergy and respiratory research at Pfizer >“Viruses are really tiny, and their business is to get as quickly as they can inside your cells. So, they bind to a receptor on the surface and inject themselves into your cell. So, they’re inside. Antibodies are big molecules and they’re generally outside your cells. > So just think about that for a moment. Antibodies and viruses are in separate compartments. The virus is inside the cell, the antibodies outside the cell. I’m not saying antibodies have no role, but they’re really not very important. This has been proven. There are some people in whom a natural experiment has occurred. > They have a defect and they actually don’t make antibodies, but they’re able to fight off COVID-19, the virus SARS-CoV-2, quite well. The way they do that is, they have T-cell immunity, cellular immunity. [T-cells] are cells that are trained to detect virus-infected cells and to kill those cells. That’s how you defend yourself against a virus. > So, all of these mentions of antibody levels, it’s just bunk. It is not a good measure of whether or not you’re immune. It does give evidence that you’ve been infected, but their persistence is not important as to whether you’ve got immunity … > We’ve known this for decades. We’ve known about T-cells for decades. They were clearly in my undergraduate textbooks. And we’ve known about their importance in defending you against respiratory viruses since probably the 1970s, certainly the 1980s. So, don’t believe anything where people suggest to you that their role is uncertain. We’ve known for a very long time that they are absolutely central.”

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

Confirming its not a vaccine.

So what is it?

[–] 5 pts

Experimental gene therapy.

[–] 2 pts

Deploying genetic changes and markers they can use to exterminate you with later.

[–] 2 pts

wrong. They keep the genetically modified sheep and release something that kills the rest. ITs the only way to build a sheep populace that will take every drug ever and will continue slaving away for the 1% jews.

[–] 0 pt

Which does what?

[–] 6 pts

Anything they want it to. It's the biological equivalent of running an unknown executable on your computer.

[–] 4 pts

Hack your cells to produce whatever protein they damn well please. Potentially speaking of course.

The role of mRNA is protein synthesis, viruses replicate using viral RNA and host cell machinery.

They could have injected people with a fragment of the virus or a dead and/or inert version of it to expose the immune system and prime them against the real thing. Instead they go the mRNA route for some nefarious purpose.

[–] 3 pts

Fucks with your genes. The actual details are unimportant, to me. I could go on Sci-Hub and look up information on said spike-protein, what it does and where it's present, etc, etc. I think that it's literally just the kick-start to the elites' transhumanist agenda. They're doing simply that: experimenting. They want to see causes and effects, while believing that there's so many humans on this planet that it doesn't matter how many of us they kill in the process. But this is all speculation.

[–] 2 pts

The spike protein binds to your cells, like the Dr. said. The specific receptor that the spike protein binds to is called ACE2, which stands for angiotensin converting enzyme 2. As the name implies it's an enzyme receptor which converts the hormonal protein angiotensin 2.

Angiotensin 2 is a hormone that regulates some body functions, which regulates other hormones, which regulates some other body functions.

When the spike protein binds to ACE2 receptors in order to infect you with the virus, it also has the effect of stopping the ACE2 receptors from breaking down angiotensin 2. Because of this, the serum level of angiotensin 2 increases in the blood, increasing vasopressin and aldosterone production. The more spike proteins are in your body, the higher the probability that the proteins are affecting ACE2 function, leading to a hormonal imbalance.

I'll let you figure out what happens when you have extreme hormonal imbalances, when you have angiotensin 2 poisoning or excess aldosterone or vasopressin.

[–] 1 pt

A litmus test perhaps, but the thing is that we know TPTB don't want us to survive and be a menace to their existence unlike their good goys. Why would they keep us around just to topple their technocracy? It makes more sense to me that the willingly unvaccinated are the ones who will eventually catch a real manufactured disease released by TPTB that only affects them.

[–] 0 pt

While that makes sense, as a starting point, I believe your expected outcome is inaccurate. There's "too many variables," in "natural life." They couldn't possible release something that kills a specific demographic, or they'd have done it already. Instead, they need to paint the target on their target's back themselves. In this case: a very specific spike-protein.

[–] 0 pt

I hear what you're saying but it doesn't cross off from my list the idea that we aren't the group who they solely want around. We're the antagonists and the primary target. It's possible people are getting painted now with these vaccines to be passed over when the real bug comes.

I just can't see a scenario where they decide to kill off the sheep and keep us wolves, it would certainly spell their demise.