Thoughts on germ vs terrain theory?
I believe in a hybrid. You can culture things like staph aureus from infections of the skin, however it isn't just the bacteria that cause it. You need a cut, and immune weakness to get infection so it depends on the terrain of the body and the microbe. I don't believe in viruses at all though
When you say you don't believe in them what do you mean?
I should clarify. I use 'viruses' in my research actually. Here is what I acknowledge exists and is verifiable: I can add certain DNA and chemicals to human cells in a dish and they will begin to create small particles that are pushed out of the cells. These particles can be given to other mammalian cells in a dish (or an animal) and induce transcriptional changes in genes even alter the genome of the cells it targets. That's where my agreement ends because that is all I can observe myself. I don't believe in the theory that these particles are a pathogen infecting us, I believe they are our own body's response to some kind of injury or insult. They can induce gene regulation changes in other cells because they are designed as a way for our cells to communicate with each other. That way, if there is some kind of injury like a cut, or a vitamin deficiency, etc our cells can signal to each other how to respond. All we have to go off is this transcriptional change, and electron microscope images of some kind of particle. There is no evidence it isn't a normal part of human cells, they even admit that exosomes are real and do exactly what I said above. Exosomes look just like 'viruses'. No one has ever tried to infect a rat or monkey with a pure sample of a virus, that would be the easiest experiment and 100% confirm the theory to me but they won't ever do it. Just inject a 'virus' into the animal and show they get the disease, but they don't do it. I do think that injecting these exosomes/viruses ala vaccines can produce a response because you are injecting large amounts of foreign materials including human and dog cells, mercury, aluminum etc that make us sick. I'm not 100% settled but I just don't see any evidence for viruses. Not to mention the amount of hoaxery around them like with HIV being a total fraud.
Germ theory is based off of talmudic principles for one.
I'd like to learn more about terrain theory.
Feel free to take a look at my new sub. https://poal.co/s/GermTheoryHoax
I have many explanations through my comments on the basics of the theory.
Here's the best summary of the Terrain Theory:
Disease arises from micro-organisms within the cells of the body.
These intracellular microorganisms normally function to build and assist in the metabolic processes of the body.
The function of these organisms changes to assist in the catabolic (disintegration) processes of the host organism when that organism dies or is injured, which may be chemical as well as mechanical.
Microorganisms change their shapes and colours to reflect the medium
Every disease is associated with a particular condition.
Microorganisms become “pathogenic” as the health of the host organism deteriorates. Hence, the condition of the host organism is the primary causal agent.
Disease is built by unhealthy conditions.
To prevent disease we have to create health.
Look at the jewish shills who just use ad hominem comments while ignoring the jewish connection in my posts. They literally IGNORE that the germ theory is based off of talmudic principles taught straight to the man who thought up the germ theory.
Louis Pasteur got the idea from Rabbi Dr. Israel Michel Rabinowitz. He translated the Talmud to French.
(post is archived)