The main concern about this vaccine, and COVID-targeting vaccines in general, is that the disease kills because the antigens it expresses tend to make the immune system overreact, so presenting the antigen apart from the disease can also make the immune system overreact. The mRNA version is intended to present the antigen at lower levels over a longer period of time than simply injecting the antigen. But it's still producing the antigen, and if your body overreacts there's no way to undo adding the antigen production to random cells in your body, it'd be many weeks before the mRNA degrades and production stops.
There are also questions as to what effects the antigen has inside cells. The mRNA itself, not so much. Simply injecting an antigen doesn't necessarily result in its uptake.
Cool.
Can I ask you to expand on your comments around the left using arguments to push environmental concern based agendas?
What techniques did you notice that I was using that you see them using?
If you don't mind. One of the cool things about this site is that we get a chance to run into people who can talk shop about our skills vs their skills and I would be curious to hear your breakdown of what I was doing vs. what they normally do.
I have a few open conversations going on this topic, there are a bunch of people interested in how the left thinks, strategizes and operates. I would mind hearing your thoughts.
I don't think the left is doing anything special aside from reacting in hysteria and then building on it as much as possible. Not letting crisis go to waste. Much like you were doing. But if you make that effect the primary goal you'll lose sight of the truth, and may wind up doing things harmful to your own cause - or to humanity in general - without intending to. Being reactionary, ultimately conservative - and "fighting global warming" is absolutely reactionary.
(post is archived)