WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

803

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Fuck your condescension too. "Editing the genome" has a VERY SPECIFIC MEANING and you are SKIRTING THAT MEANING, redefining terms in order to INCITE DISORDER. You are adopting tactics from the left and it fucking sucks. Quit it.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

No, I'm making fun of you. Because, somehow, you cannot see that we don't disagree.

Not only did I not say anything that you said I said, not only do I agree with you, I also provided provisional potential critiques and invited you to take what I said apart, re-edit and provide a more accurate picture.

I'm happy to be shown to be wrong.

You are right.

// EDIT: Yes, also, I'm a pretentious asshole. It's a flaw. I can't write anything in a few words like you can. I mean what I wrote honestly but it reads like pretentious bullshit. I totally agree.

[–] 0 pt

Yeah, well, it's fucking infuriating.

You were using what is basically the exact same argument that's being used to push the global wharming theory. Hysteria based on speculation, hilighting supporting evidence and hiding the contradictory without producing anything conclusive.

[–] 0 pt

Your rebuke accepted!

I honestly thought I was providing something productive! Heh!

I mean, honestly, expand on where your concerns lie with the mrna gene therapies.

My concern is system wide because I deal with systems and i'm at the point in my career where I look at a thing I need to make and most of the time I don't want to make it BECAUSE it isn't the end product that I am worried about any longer but the back end endless support costs of having to answer questions and emails about all of the edge cases involved in inserting the new product into the ecosystem.

How would you describe your concerns?