1. When it occurs in wild animals it's still an aberration from normal behavior and detracts from the ability to sustain the species.

2. Since when are morals and behavioral standards for humans dictated by how wild animals behave? If faggots want to walk down that path we can instantly eliminate the government hierarchy that protects them and forces their degeneracy on everyone else.

Chemicals.

In the water.

Turning the frogs.

Gay.

Even IF it does randomly occur in nature, it's irrelevant because they're unlikely to reproduce. (Edit: unlikely in that if they really are faggots, they're not going to mate with the opposite sex out of some sort of sense of obligation.) They die off and that's the end of it because even though it may happen, it's not as nature had intended and nature finds a way to fix itself. In addition, the animal kingdom doesn't give a shit about ideology. So the whole point is moot.

Edit: Link not working, search "Common side-blotched lizard mating".

Also Female Mimicry, a "soft" male can try to avoid competition and "sneak mate" to reproduce.

This was never a good comparison. Animals do lots of things humans don't want to do, like eat their own poop.

Bonobos, a close relation of the chimp, actually live the life that the dirty hippies aspire to live. Not only do they exist in a primeval, matriarchal, paradise where food simply falls from the trees with no effort or labor, but whenever the troupe encounters a rich trove of a favorite fruit, they immediately engage in a frenzied group-sexual orgy: gay, straight, pedophiliac (Pedomonkey!) with no taboos except that male bonobos are reluctant to rut with their mothers.

This is explained as a means of keeping group cohesion in the face of a potential conflict over resources, literally the hippie adage "make love, not war."

https://www.sexualityresource.com/blog/sex-in-the-wild

This embarrassing predilection for ape-orgies is probably why they do not feature more in nature documentaries.

There are well documented cases of animals becoming confused sexually when their niches in society are all fucked up.

'Normal' is not defined as never, more like usual. And perverted is defined as abnormal, unusual.

In animals it is generally a natural instinct to dominate when a male or female acts submissive. That could be interpteted as acting homosexual. I doubt there are many animals that literally don't mate with the opposite sex ever.

Do believe that sexuality is a sliding scale for evolutionary reasons, being more or less feminine or masculine can have advantages depending on an environment, which may change rapidly. So varience across a population would be good.

But varience based on random gene inheritance could easily lead to a small percentage of outliers that cross a threshold of sexual preference that makes them only attracted to same sex. Probably.

Wasn't there a study that showed women that like masculine men are more likely to have gay sons (ironically)?

There is also helpful uncle / aunty theory. Someone that can defend the tribe or help with child care. But doesn't consume as much resourse as an extra family. Not sure if the numbers add up on that though.

need an excuse to suck some guy's dick do ya? animals use sexual behavior for roles of dominance in their respective groups. Gays and other fags fuck the same sex because they were molested as children and their poor little fucked up brains can't fix the neuronal short.