Your gut is directly connected to your brain, by a newly discovered neuron circuit [1280x720 - 1.1MB]

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (34).

[–] • 0 pt

Yeah botox is used for other stuff. But if you post that botox cures diabetes, dont source it with studies showing botox cures pancreatitis.

Im not retarded. You pulled a switcheroo. Now Im looking for studies on the subject of botox for diabetes and Im not finding any. If you have one, this would be a good time to cited it

You made a claim. I just want to understand whos doing it and how it works. Excessive formatting is not enough for me sorry.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

(edited )

Dont be RETARDED!

I told you solid and true FACTS, I did not at all provide you with recent 2021 papers. Look them up yourself.

I am not wrong. I told you true facts.

I make no claims that I need to teach you about. Its called the "intellectual chasm". Keep up if you can, but I cannot spend the energy to teach you years of science.

It is a fucking AMAZING fact that disconnecting nerves, or killing with botox , does indeed truly stop diabetes.

And why are you using BRAND NAMES of drugs?

If you are not a scientist, I apologize to you, and will toss you a bone.

botox is but a saltwater compound of diluted Botulinum toxin.

Botulinum toxin is used vs scalpel for high value large lab specimens, and in humans. Do your paper searches for "Botulinum" and "diabetes" and not for leg pains, and I assume you will find some 2020 or 2021 papers.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

I am not saying you are wrong. Im saying I want a source of someone treating animals with this technique. I cant find any. I dont take claims at face value. I check them. Dont gimme that intellectual chasm shit.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

(edited )

Interference with pancreatic sympathetic signaling halts the onset of diabetes in mice:

https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb2878 https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/6/35/eabb2878.full

used a scalpel, and a drug (6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA), a neurotoxin) to cure diabetes in mice, but the papers authors in interviews refer to botox as equivalent in their pop-science writups of that paper , not even one year old.

The authors preference for 6-OHDA vs using botox, a stronger more local neurotoxin, is probably a labor saving device.

Efficacy ??? 85% efficacy for surgery.

Only 15% (surgical denervation) and 27% (chemical denervation) of the animals progressed to diabetes compared with the 100% incidence in mice that underwent sham surgery or vehicle treatment

85% efficacy... good scalpel control in a mouse!

a search for papers that point back (cite) "https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb2878" in 5 months should yield about 4 other similar studies.

Those authors of that paper do other super advanced research related to a drug cure, and not a temp 6 month cure involving surgery.

They will not be revisiting that paper, but others are going forward with it.

85% overnight efficacy in mice.

For natural pool of genetically predisposed to type-2 diabetes, takes money and time but varieties of species exist. Even a normal livestock commerical breed of sheep can be induced into diabetes at a rate of 1 in 44 animals in one year, if all 44 sheep are allowed unfettered access to FRUCTOSE snacks, vs sucrose, for one year. (Fructose is sadly not detected well in blood by humans nor sheep, and triggers those genetically predisposed to catch diabetes) A faster way to get diabetes in a primate genetically predisposed to get it, without loading on fructose, is by blood transfusion from another diabetic primate, discovered in Italy in 1974 or so, though this fact rarely talked about or studied. Also humans crash dieting can get diabetes years earlier than normal, if genetically predisposed. Now, finally, some bold scientists re-prove diabetes from a blood transfusion :

Researchers transmitted diabetes from one mouse to another just by injecting the animals :

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/08/could-diabetes-spread-mad-cow-disease

https://medicorx.com/new-study-finds-type-2-diabetes-may-be-transmissible/

That paper REFUSES to discuss human blood transfusion.... a political "hot potato". And yet, it is a FACT, a fucking FACT that some people can get type 2 diabetes from blood transfusions as shown in 1974.

**Interference with pancreatic sympathetic signaling halts the onset of diabetes in mice**: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb2878 https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/6/35/eabb2878.full used a scalpel, and a drug (6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA), a neurotoxin) to cure diabetes in mice, but the papers authors in interviews refer to botox as equivalent in their pop-science writups of that paper , not even one year old. The authors preference for 6-OHDA vs using botox, a stronger more local neurotoxin, is probably a labor saving device. Efficacy ??? 85% efficacy for surgery. > Only 15% (surgical denervation) and 27% (chemical denervation) of the animals progressed to diabetes compared with the 100% incidence in mice that underwent sham surgery or vehicle treatment 85% efficacy... good scalpel control in a mouse! a search for papers that point back (cite) "https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb2878" in 5 months should yield about 4 other similar studies. Those authors of that paper do other super advanced research related to a drug cure, and not a temp 6 month cure involving surgery. They will not be revisiting that paper, but others are going forward with it. 85% overnight efficacy in mice. For natural pool of genetically predisposed to type-2 diabetes, takes money and time but varieties of species exist. Even a normal livestock commerical breed of sheep can be induced into diabetes at a rate of 1 in 44 animals in one year, if all 44 sheep are allowed unfettered access to FRUCTOSE snacks, vs sucrose, for one year. (Fructose is sadly not detected well in blood by humans nor sheep, and triggers those genetically predisposed to catch diabetes) A faster way to get diabetes in a primate genetically predisposed to get it, without loading on fructose, is by blood transfusion from another diabetic primate, discovered in Italy in 1974 or so, though this fact rarely talked about or studied. Also humans crash dieting can get diabetes years earlier than normal, if genetically predisposed. Now, finally, some bold scientists re-prove diabetes from a blood transfusion : Researchers transmitted diabetes from one mouse to another just by injecting the animals : https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/08/could-diabetes-spread-mad-cow-disease https://medicorx.com/new-study-finds-type-2-diabetes-may-be-transmissible/ That paper REFUSES to discuss human blood transfusion.... a political "hot potato". And yet, it is a FACT, a fucking FACT that some people can get type 2 diabetes from blood transfusions as shown in 1974.

parent
link

Load more (1 reply)