WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

298

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Your words do not change the facts.

Pluto is indeed too small even after any measurement revision.

The facts are that the IAU is the ruling body for naming.

Science has meaning.

Making pluto a planet immediately would create dozens of other eligible planets.

Its just a fact.

One day the definition of "Homo Sapiens sapiens" will be based on DNA , like all other mammals, and exclude niggers, and then sentimentalists like you will probably try and screech "Why rewrite all those textbooks? Niggers think like man! Niggers are people like us! DNA is kike lies! DNA is evil"

[–] 0 pt

The facts are that Pluto is still a planet, and that it was demoted due to fake news from scientists who made a hot take from 9 billion miles away.

Science has meaning.

In Clown World, where we all reside now, the meaning of science is consensus. Which is to say not science at all.

"Why rewrite all those textbooks? Niggers think like man!"

But they do not, everyone who knows niggers knows this. Niggers have no future-time orientation, no ability to delay gratification, no ability to grasp cause-and-effect. The few that do have some of these traits are mutants or mixed breeds (ie: mutants).

Pluto is still larger than Eris. Perhaps it will also prove to be more massive as well.

[–] 0 pt

Nothing in the definition of planet has ANYTHING to do with size, except insofar as hydrostatic equilibrium is concerned. It’s a bad definition. Period.