WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 10 pts

By far.

IQ, Eugenics, and Social structures aside, just a simple observation of the negro in it's unnatural habitat absolutely solidifies this argument.

The subversive know it. We know it.

Make damn sure your Children know it.

[–] -2 pt

*its

You write like a nigger-brained fool.

[–] 0 pt

Itz tallest faggot!

[–] 0 pt

Wrong guy. He’s a paid shill’s sockpuppet.

[–] 5 pts

It doesn't take an intellectual to know that niggers are vile, subhuman creatures with ape-like brains that cause them to have a severe lack of empathy and basic intelligence. This is also why racial miscegenation laws are a must for any future White society that wishes to avoid total subversion and destruction: diluting Aryan blood with negroid blood is the same as cursing your descendants for all eternity.

[–] 0 pt

This is also why racial miscegenation laws are a must for any future White society

They are, but I doubt they will do any good as God put them into Deuteronomy and they didn't exactly stay enforced.

We might need to do what Richard Nixon proposed: mandatory abortions of every half-black baby. Though perhaps there'd be room for a "humane" option of sending the mudshark + niglet + baby daddy all home to Apefrica?

[–] 2 pts

I'd rather have a troop of baboons living in my attic, than one nigger 1000 miles away

[–] 0 pt

Oy vey goy, votes for baboons.

[–] 2 pts

Yes, a chihuahua is more closely related to a wolf than a negro is to any human.

[–] 3 pts (edited )

VERY TRUE!

a chihuahua is more closely related to a wolf than a negro is to any human.

Very true, we aren't one species, its All humans vs Negros.

The Fixation index, or FST, is a way to measure genetic distance between populations.

The FST between Whites (British) and Blacks (Bantu) is 0.23.

The FST between the common chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and the bonobo (Pan paniscus) is 0.103 ... which is half the Black-White distance despite the two being classified as separate species.

The FST between two gorilla species, Gorilla gorilla and Gorilla beringei is 0.04 ... or 1/6 the difference between Blacks and Whites.

The FST between humans and Neanderthals is less than 0.08 ... or about 1/3 the White-Black difference.

The FST between humans and homo erectus is 0.17 ... or about 3/4 the White-Black difference.

Thus Whites and Blacks are more genetically distant than two different chimpanzee species, two different gorilla species, humans vs. Neanderthals, and humans vs. homo erectus. If one is consistent and objective with taxonomic classification systems even in regards to human populations, Blacks and Whites could (and arguably should) be classified into separate species and at the very least into different subspecies.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2675054/

https://www.genetics.org/content/105/3/767.abstract

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0018442X04700335

https://mbe.oxfordjournals.org/content/19/8/1359.full

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2730349/

https://frissekijk.info/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/100-Facts1.pdf Updated: https://files.catbox.moe/st3yff.pdf

Kikepedia states the same things.

From https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/88164798/#q88176182

Table showing about 25 IQ related specific genes, of 1,016 known, that MOSTLY are missing in modern africans:

https://files.catbox.moe/2pqwi6.png

And that's not even the Neanderthal cranium, brain folding, or birth canal genes, just ancient genes.

from database via : doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0147-3

https://files.catbox.moe/z972lb.pdf

2018.07 : Gene discovery and polygenic prediction from a genome-wide association study of educational attainment in 1.1 million individuals

All humans have Neanderthal genes, and quite a few are IQ related. Between 1% and 20% of the human genome is Neanderthal, depending on region. And a single human has 1 to 2.9% of these Neanderthal genes.

Except for pure-bred negros. They have 0.0000%. Not even a trace ever seen in any skeleton over 300 years old in Africa. Only the recent mixed mongrels have some from their human side.

Similar to Neanderthals, there were many ancient hominids in Africa that were thought to have gone extinct. Because none of the human races have any of their DNA markers. All humans have 0% of their DNA. Except for negros. Turns our their ancestors interbred with the ancient hominids, and they now have 1% to 10% of their DNA.

Neanderthals separated from our last common ancestor 400k to 1 million years ago, then re-mated with modern humans and created a few surviving offspring as recently as 15,000 yars ago, and provably mated twice in history with smarter asians via eastward traveling Denisovans whom had Neanderthal DNA, as those groups freely interbred.

The ancient African hominids separated from our last common ancestor 1 million to 2 million years ago. Some current negros have Y DNA A00a-L1149 from 350,000 years separation. This means that not only did mankind NOT come from africa, but also that Blacks are an unrelated species (350,000 years is over 120,000 years DNA separation).

The IQ genes (many from Neanderthal) lacking in Negros, proven in 269,867 tested humans IQ.

2018 : 1,016 genes paper = Genome-Wide Association Meta-Analysis In 269,867 Individuals Identifies New Genetic And Functional Links To Intelligence Nature Genetics (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0152-6

You can look up specific genes for specific racial groups :

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41588-018-0152-6

Is the study showing the genes!

Also for polygenic scores: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41588-018-0147-3

Relevant tables: 11, 12, 13, 15, 44.

To find the differences in these alleles you have to go to https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/variation/tools/1000genomes/ yourself and look for superpopulations Europeans and modern Africans.

For example: rs159428 (T) and then you look at the allele frequency differences!

[–] [deleted] 4 pts

I love bringing this up to the I Fucking Love Science!!! retards. "Oh, that's great. I believe in science too, especially the genetic tests that prove negros are another species"

[–] 1 pt

The answer is to obvious as to require elaboration, yet this fine young writer did anyways.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Negros proven to be different species via genetic drift.

Hah! All blacks are a different species than all real humans, including silverbacked Rape-Ape, and the Negroid felonious

A Different Species!

Bears, wolves and gorillas are all considered by mainstream science to be separate species, yet they do not apply this "species" logic to humans, despite clear evidence that the African is NOT a modern human.

Sadly, I predict they will revise the word "species" and demote wolves, demote gorillas, and demote bears, to preserve Negroes feelings, even though it still requires every book to be rewritten that uses wolves, bear, or gorillas, or mentions the definition of "species". Negroes feelings must be preserved.

Blacks already proven NOT human!

As when the definition of a "planet" was all agreed on , then evidence came out that Pluto broke the rules AGREED ON for "planet", there was a "messy situation" were every 2nd grade school book on earth for kids as well as every text book, had to be re-printed and suddenly omit Pluto as a planet!

PLUTO WAS NEVER A PLANET, due to science definitions made earlier for the word "PLANET"

NEGROES are a different hominid species than all other existing humans on earth!

NEGROES WERE NEVER the same species as humans, due to science definitions made earlier for the word "SPECIES"

I am not talking about SUBSPECIES, and am being literal, and using the word "SPECIES"

We know this from DNA. DNA does not lie. The definition of same-species in 2021 and recent years is two factors :

• 1 > DNA drift distance of under 120,000 years
AND
• 2 > Able to mate and reproduce a fertile viable offspring, both male or female, AND not breaking rule #1 (DNA drift distance of under 120,000 years)

We try to genetically force two animals to breed a viable fertile offspring, and they cannot, then is is called A DIFFERENT SPECIES. But to be same species other criteria also is relevant.

If scientists can get two organisms to produce a viable fertile organism, it is NOT the same species if the animals' DNA drifted over 120,000 years of proven separation : (Bear SPECIES, Gorilla SPECIES, Wolf SPECIES).

See? DNA decides what a species is in 2021.

Gorilla SPECIES (species not subspecies) can breed and produce viable fertile offspring. Yet their DNA is probably drifted over 120,000 years.

(Gorilla gorilla vs. Gorilla beringei) : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gorilla

Bear SPECIES (species not subspecies) can breed and produce viable fertile offspring. Yet their DNA is probably drifted over 120,000 years.

http://bearwithus.org/8-bears-of-the-world/

"Polar Bears Evolved Just 150,000 Years Ago" : https://www.livescience.com/10956-polar-bears-evolved-150-000-years.html

The Gray wolf, Red wolf and Ethiopian wolf SPECIES (species not subspecies) can breed and produce viable fertile offspring. Yet their DNA is probably drifted less than 120,000 years (100,000 for Ethiopian Wolf) : http://wolffacts.org/ethiopian-wolf-facts.html

Animals that drifted far more than the ridiculous 350,000 year separation from Negros and true humans, can interbreed too. It is uncommon but possible. In these other mammals many fetuses die and are absorbed, but occasionally you can get live births by breeding countless mammals against each other, even with different numbers of chromosomes. :

Here Are 18 Amazing Animal Hybrids You Won’t Believe Exist But Are Completely Real:

http://boredomtherapy.com/real-animal-hybrids/ - https://archive.md/gVqrn

ASTOUNDING! Look at those!

I show those in that link to demonstrate that animal life forms can be forced to mate with each other in hilarious ways, and some produce fertile offspring, but DNA age drift is used as the definition of species.

So yes, you can mate a true human (Homo Sapiens sapiens, with Neanderthal IQ gene admixture)... with a Hominid such as the major negro ethnicities in Africa (whom lack even a speck of Neanderthal DNA) :

  • Tigrean
  • Amharic
  • Sudanese-Barya
  • Nilotic
  • Funji Nilotic
  • Tuareg-Beja Cushitic
  • Nubian
  • Wolof-Peul-Serer
  • Bantu MOST common in recent 300 years
  • Bedic Bantu
  • West African
  • Mbuti Pygmy
  • Sara Nilotic-Biaka Pygmy
  • San Khosian-Somali
  • Khoi Khosian
  • Hazda Khosian
  • Sandawe Khosian

Above list also summarized on MODERN species and sub species (races) proposed names of various Homo shit-skins (detailed but lacking DNA refs) :

https://propertarianism.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/the-species-of-great-apes.pdf

All those Negroid hominids can be bred with true humans, and produce fertile offspring, but that does not make those 350,000 year divergent subspecies the same as true modern Humans.

The "fertile offspring, disregarding DNA evidence" is the OLD definition, that is why we have Bear, Gorilla, and Wolf SPECIES (not subspecies, but actual SPECIES), because their DNA drifted over 120,000 years.

Blacks predate by hundreds of thousands of years, the relatively recent emergence of true humans in Europe, and far far far before Humans picked up IQ genes from Neanderthals. Pure blacks lack any Neanderthal DNA!

ALL true humans (non african negroes) have some intermixed Neanderthal DNA, adding many brain boosting IQ genes, All humans everywhere on earth have these very recent genes except pure negros.

NEANDERTHAL BRAIN DNA?

Neanderthal genes (lacking only in Negros) contributes much of the known 538 genes for higher IQ.

538 genes that are thought to be linked to intelligence (by comparing 300,000 test subjects) :

https://archive.is/pJYfe (original deleted by SJWs)

Of the 538 genes for above 100 IQ intelligence, which can 80% predict your IQ, west african Negroes and Australian aborigines LACK most of the smart genes!

ALL humans on earth except blacks have brain folding genes from RECENT cross breeding with NEANDERTHALS (yes even everyone in south america), and the asians have these genes by breeding with DENISOVIANS (who also had bred earlier with NEANDERTHALS).

Except for negroes, in latest studies of massive DNA databases, all humans (Homo sapiens sapiens) alive have 1% to 2.9% Neanderthal DNA on average per nation.

All Whites ALSO have lots of proven Cro-Magnon DNA too!:

Europe's Ancestors: Cro-Magnon 28,000 Years Old Had DNA Like Modern Humans:

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/07/080715204741.htm

And the SMARTEST asians bred at two points in history with DENISOVIANS, for more IQ, while the water-niggers and Thais only interbred one time.

Modern asian Humans (smart non-Thai asians) interbred with Denisovans TWICE in history :

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/03/180315140718.htm

Some smarter asians picked up DNA, just as whites did, by breeding with Neanderthal&Denisovian half-breeds from conquering Neanderthal males... with full actual DNA sequenced from actual half-breed Denisovian+Neanderthal breeding bone fragment example ! :

Wow! DNA proof of a 1st gen half-breed Denisovian+Neanderthal (typical source of asian intelligence): 1st gen!!!

https://wgno.com/2018/08/24/dna-reveals-first-known-child-of-neanderthal-and-denisovan-study-says/

Sadly, the percentage of Neanderthal DNA in modern black humans is zero !!! (they interbred 300,000 to 185,000 years ago with a ape-like hominid, probably a version of Homo heidelbergensis branch):

https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/primer/dtcgenetictesting/neanderthaldna

9 LIVING CAVEMEN with ACTUAL NEGROID HOMO ERECTUS Y DNA INTACT found in CAMEROON, and a camaroon negro found in USA with caveman DNA from 300,000 years ago completely unrelated to real humans ! :

https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2013-03/uoa-hyc030413.php

A00a-L1149 (or A00a1) Y DNA is 350,000 years old in many Negroes. Negroes DO NOT have common ancestor human Y DNA nicknamed "Y-chromosomal Adam" but they keep changing the definition every 5 years, to not demean Negroes :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y-chromosomal_Adam

US Gov scientists agree that some Negroes discovered to be non-human, and Negroes interbred with ape-like creatures long long ago :

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3591855/

Shocking quotes from PMC4947341 "Hominin interbreeding and the evolution of human variation":

one-fifth of the Neanderthal genome may lurk within modern humans... (but totally absent in Negroes)

SUBHUMAN! interbreeding between Sub-Saharan Africans and an as-yet-unknown hominin, such as H. heidelbergensis...

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4947341/

Its been known since 1874 that Blacks are NOT human, and lots of data to prove it.

The negro ape in 2nd most famous biology book ever written, by famed Ernst Haeckel, 1874, Page 527 of 780 :

WOW! :

https://files.catbox.moe/e2pi6l.jpg

Homo erectus went extinct only 50,000 years ago (100,000 tops) and was provably low IQ and PROVEN LAZY, similar to current Blacks, but unknown how much DNA admixture of Homo erectus is in the modern negro, if any, due to heat damage of artifact DNA, Negroes diverged from all real humans 350,000 years ago, as proven and mentioned frequently already (current Negro Y-DNA A00a-L1149).

Laziness in Homo erectus proof YES LAZY BLACKS! :

https://www.livescience.com/63308-homo-erectus-laziness-extinction.html

NOT JUST LAZY hominids, but LOW IQ, lazy Blacks never invented any crops, domesticated animals, or even the WHEEL!

Whites & Blacks 100 FACTS!:
http://yun.complife.info/100facts.htm

Even though Blacks are now proven from over 350,000 years ago, vs real Humans nowadays, There were MANY types of Hominids that looked like humans, right up until each were killed off and replaced by Modern Humans.

No matter how you organize the timeline, DNA does not lie. Blacks separated from all real humans 350,000 years ago.

TL;DR: Negroes are not HUMAN species! Today only DNA is used to differentiate species,

[–] 0 pt

PLUTO WAS NEVER A PLANET, due to science definitions made earlier for the word "PLANET"

But wasn't Pluto found to have been wrongly stripped of its planethood and was reinstated as a planet?

[–] 0 pt

No... not by proper consensus using proper definition : International Astronomical Union (IAU)

Words have meaning in science.

In 2006 International Astronomical Union (IAU) corrected pluto to non-planet by most criteria.

They never reversed or else we would have dozens more new planets.

[–] 0 pt

Yet New Horizons went out there and found that, oopsie, the astronomers had mismeasured Pluto and it is actually larger than Eris, and is still the largest known solar system object beyond Neptune. The IAU fags are circling the wagons and claiming that even though they were wrong about Pluto's size, they're correct about its mass, and now mass is what defines a planet. Talk about moving the goalposts.

That's part of why the head of NASA gainsaid the idiots at the IAU and reinstated Pluto's planethood.

In a surprisingly semi-"based" move, The Big Bang Theory mocked Neil Dumbass Tyson for his role in demoting Pluto. NDT, the self-stylized racist "black science guy" who fabricates quotes and couldn't even place the Equator on the Earth, is the pointman for this supposed science. That's a big strike to its credibility.

Plus I find it hard to trust faggot "scientists" who decided to get woke and start naming celestial objects after Hawaiian and Indian deities. When we've got Pajeet the Diversity Hire manning the telescopes, and given naming privileges, all bets are off.

[–] 0 pt

The IAU are a bunch of idiots. The current planet definition excludes Earth, Mars, Jupiter, and Neptune.

[–] 1 pt

Sorry niggers, you're more related to apes than to humans. Next time better.

[–] 1 pt

What makes this link great is that it's from the Jim Crow Museum of Racist Memorabilia.

Sadly, it's not actually meant to be a tourist destination.

>

[–] 1 pt

The Jim Crow museum of racist memorabilia

I'm going to have to make a separate post with their about page.

[–] 1 pt

Quick answer,...Y E S they are!

Load more (12 replies)