Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

1.3K

(post is archived)

[–] • 26 pts

A doctor or scientist will say anything if you pay them enough.

[–] • 16 pts

Not quite. In academia it's more survivorship bias. The people that speak the truth fail to get grants and fail to get published. The people that push this propaganda get funding, get published, and have their articles shared in the media.

I'm not saying you can't bribe scientists or that they don't respond to incentives, but most of the people that believe this bullshit genuinely believe it and they go on to enforce that culture within academia, making this insanity far more sustainable than outright bribery.

[–] • 9 pts

Nowadays in academia, you have to submit a diversity statement along with your application. If you don't repeat the correct dogma and platitudes, they won't even hire you.

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts

Just like how science was under religious faggots.

[–] • 1 pt

Almost....Who gives/controls all those grants?

[–] • 0 pt

It's exactly who you think it is. But because these grants are "clean" money it's harder to call attention to it. But it's very much selective bias, only platforming people with favorable research and not funding people with unfavorable research.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Then Why Chinese, and Russian scientists often get along with Wester ones?

[–] • 0 pt

Exactly. Biology doesn't even exist anymore as a science.

[–] • 6 pts

A better example is dogs. Everyone understands there’s different types of dogs. That’s the example I use when explaining how awful niggers are. Then I point out how no matter where they are it sucks. All their countries. All the cities and neighborhoods regardless of country. I point out how white countries are great. Across the board better. Then I point out that the best African country is the one with white people in it. Then I stick my finger in their mouths and tell them to suck it

[–] • 2 pts

I believe every word of this. Especially the end knowing you bud. Lololol

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

According to Science there is only 1 race for ALL of mankind.. The Human Race.

According to the Bible all of us are descendants of Adam and Eve. ( yes both Science and the Bible agree on many things this is but one of them)

What this means is every man , woman, and child not his planet is the same race.

After the Great Flood , a great leader arose and declared they should all be in one place. same city/state

They started building a tower. While they were building it God confused thiner languages. Then the different groups of people fled That dispersal is also accepted by science .

[–] • 0 pt

Dogs aren't that great of an example as they have been so manipulated by us. 260 years ago there were only 6 different kinds of dogs, look how many we have created. If it gets through to them, fine then.

[–] • 0 pt

And you can't do the same thing with people?

[–] • 0 pt

No it’s a fine example. Because it’s simple and very obvious

[–] • 0 pt

Dogs and horses are the best examples to use. It was this same logic that slave owners used to breed stronger slaves.

[–] • 5 pts

What they always fall back on and teach in school is that if two animals cannot breed they are different species. So supposedly the two on the top cannot breed but I imagine that's only because of geographical distance. I'd like to see a paper about why they are different species there must be one.

[–] [deleted] • 4 pts

Ok, I bring up the fact that there are lots of examples of hybridization.

I have no doubt that if one keep a mixed group of the two on the top you'd get hybrid offspring.

[–] • 5 pts (edited )

Ok, I bring up the fact that there are lots of examples of hybridization.

Here is an exhaustive list, sorted by the distance between the parents, (macroevolution.net) which is used to make the argument that we, humans, are also hybrids (not derived from Chimps, but a 'lucky' chimp/pig cross), as we have the typical traits. (macroevolution.net)

In short:

And, most crucially, apparently our enlarged brains are due to the pigs capillary structure + ability to sweat from the skin. (macroevolution.net) Apparently, the human skull has small holes to allow hot blood from the brain to cool against the scalp, a trait no primate has, and only pigs also have. However, our brain growth is lifted from the primate.

Apparently, in primates and humans, the brain will keep growing until it exhausts the body's ability to cool the brain, and then it stops growing. This is why Bantu Africans / Apes / etc will keep up with White children in controlled settings until age 12 or so, when the White child will start outpacing the nonwhite. This also appears to be why North American Africans are smarter than their Bantu cousins, and why we as a whole get smarter the colder the regional average temperature + why the summer is 'murder season' + a number of other anomalies.

[–] • 3 pts

I wonder if this is related on why some religions don't allow the eating of pig meat

[–] • 1 pt

Has it ever occurred to you that the earth is very old and the same things that are happening now with genetic fuckery has happened before?

As in, the pig is a creation of combining humans with something else, or perhaps even just failed genetic over writing, similar to what they're starting with RNA vaccine.

This is much more believable than we were made from pigs.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Cold Temp doesn’t make you smarter

[–] • 1 pt

Fascinating. So humans are an alien manufactured hybrid?

[–] • 4 pts

Theyll tell you two animals that cant breed are different species. They dont mention that just because two animals can breed doesnt mean theyre the same species. Lots of different animal species can hybridize.

[–] • 1 pt

The definition sucks and the whole thing is murky as hell as far as I can tell, that's the definition though. In fact, pulled out the dictionary just now and it's even murkier because it says they're part of the same species if they can "usually interbreed" so goddamn.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Then wolves and coyotes are the same species. So are cougar and leopard. So are grizzlies and polar bears. That would kind of shake up the ESA listings now wouldnt it? But no, they only make your claim when it applies to the human one race agenda, and discard it when it applies to pushing esa bullshit. Lions and tigers produce fertile offspring. Are lions and tigers the same species?

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts (edited )

Does it count if their offspring are mules? Some species can breed, but THOSE offspring are generally sterile and cannot reroduce, and are called mules.

  • Donkey + horse = Mule (hence the name)
  • Muscovy duck + Mallard duck = Mulard .. and so on.

I'm not sure if mixed kids are mules at all, but there is some evidence, there are issues.

Mixed race black and white couples face higher odds of prematurity and low birth weight, which appear to contribute to the substantially higher demonstrated risk for stillbirth. There are likely additional unmeasured factors that influence birth outcomes for mixed race couples.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2867623/

[–] • 2 pts

Mixed race offspring are too genetically dissimilar to either parent for them to donate bone marrow if the child needed it.

https://www.sbs.com.au/news/why-mixed-race-minorities-struggle-to-find-life-saving-transplant-matches

Anecdotally, I know a hispanic-chinese couple who had an extremely difficult pregnancy that required bedrest and the woman almost died in childbirth. Another couple is both the same european ancestry and the mom climbed mountains and went running during pregnancy and did a natural birth with no painkillers. Coincidence?

[–] • 1 pt

Heck, women used to work up until labor.

[–] • 1 pt

Lions and tigers can breed together and produce fertile offspring, yet lions =/= tigers.

[–] • 0 pt

Proving yet again that scientists are half theory.

[–] • 1 pt

Dolphins breed with false killer whales and produce fertile offspring. It’s called a wholphin

[–] • 0 pt

No, they can, they are "sub-species" like humans are.

[–] • 5 pts

Because evolution stops at the neck, bigot.

[–] • 1 pt

It does, our lower bodies are inferior to monkeys, so while our heads have "evolved" our lower bodies have "devolved"

[–] • 1 pt

I get your point, but not what I was looking for. CONFIRM MUH BIAS, DAMNIT! hahaha

[–] • 5 pts

Something something OnE sPeCiEs

Something something ThAt'S rAcISt!!1!

[–] • 4 pts

Jews.

[–] • 1 pt

That one word answer covers a lot.

[–] • 3 pts

I prefer lots of small freckles to one big freckle.

[–] • 3 pts

B.S. -bullshit

M.S. -more shit

PhD. -piled high and deep

[–] • 2 pts

That red head is gorgeous

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts (edited )

It's because modern humans, and early humans have roughly 75k years of gap. Within that time period, humans migrated to many different continents. If we had maintained more gap, then Africans, and Europeans would have evolved to be different species. Currently, you can't connect with many tribes in Amazon rainforest, and North Sentinel Island, because diseases would kill them. If they stayed isolated many years like that, they will evolve to different species.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

No one can.

Maybe this guy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7iSrGQ1cwxM

Load more (23 replies)