Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

961

Know that when they scream "follow the science" they mean the opposite. Then the whole.... Blabla lacks the qualifications or credentials.... Not an expert.... Meantime just looking at the numbers we know something is off. That is observation and curiosity, elemental to science. It is a simple matter of tallying numbers. Can be M&Ms or sick vs healthy patient, on a timeline from receiving a "cure".

Know that when they scream "follow the science" they mean the opposite. Then the whole.... Blabla lacks the qualifications or credentials.... Not an expert.... Meantime just looking at the numbers we know something is off. That is observation and curiosity, elemental to science. It is a simple matter of tallying numbers. Can be M&Ms or sick vs healthy patient, on a timeline from receiving a "cure".

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (11).
[–] • 2 pts

Remember that they also redefine what "effective" means. The straight forward expectation of what "effective" means in the context of a vaccine would be protection from contracting the disease. This has been changed to a reduction in the severity of symptoms.

Enquiring minds might like to know if the change was made before the study started, or did they redefine terms to further bolster the headline results.