WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

721

Know that when they scream "follow the science" they mean the opposite. Then the whole.... Blabla lacks the qualifications or credentials.... Not an expert.... Meantime just looking at the numbers we know something is off. That is observation and curiosity, elemental to science. It is a simple matter of tallying numbers. Can be M&Ms or sick vs healthy patient, on a timeline from receiving a "cure".

Know that when they scream "follow the science" they mean the opposite. Then the whole.... Blabla lacks the qualifications or credentials.... Not an expert.... Meantime just looking at the numbers we know something is off. That is observation and curiosity, elemental to science. It is a simple matter of tallying numbers. Can be M&Ms or sick vs healthy patient, on a timeline from receiving a "cure".

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

yes. so, it's wrong to call them covid symptoms. They got the shot, then their immune system was triggered beyond what is considered a side effect, but short of pneumonia. But they weren't included b/c no pcr positive test result. what a fucking scam. more technical blabla here: PCR tests are worthless: https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/archivos_pdf/scam-confirmed-pcr.pdf

[–] 1 pt

Correction: I shouldn't have used the words "flu-like symptoms". They ordered anyone back with "signs of respiratory illness", and PCR-tested them. If they didn't test positive in their PCR tests they were excluded. Respiratory illness symptoms are obviously a further progression from flu symptoms. The whole process bears the hoof-prints of pathological illness indeed: the familiar one reliably appearing in tandem with talmudic deception and fraud.