WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

449

Know that when they scream "follow the science" they mean the opposite. Then the whole.... Blabla lacks the qualifications or credentials.... Not an expert.... Meantime just looking at the numbers we know something is off. That is observation and curiosity, elemental to science. It is a simple matter of tallying numbers. Can be M&Ms or sick vs healthy patient, on a timeline from receiving a "cure".

Know that when they scream "follow the science" they mean the opposite. Then the whole.... Blabla lacks the qualifications or credentials.... Not an expert.... Meantime just looking at the numbers we know something is off. That is observation and curiosity, elemental to science. It is a simple matter of tallying numbers. Can be M&Ms or sick vs healthy patient, on a timeline from receiving a "cure".

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

Remember that they also redefine what "effective" means. The straight forward expectation of what "effective" means in the context of a vaccine would be protection from contracting the disease. This has been changed to a reduction in the severity of symptoms.

Enquiring minds might like to know if the change was made before the study started, or did they redefine terms to further bolster the headline results.

[–] 2 pts

0%.. actually negative effective since it's poison

[–] 0 pt

... It all depends on your definition of "effective". Probably very effective against ovetpopulation.

how can they even surmise that when the tests are flawed and the virus has never ever been isolated?

[–] 3 pts

There is no marker, no reference. 72% of test subjects got sick 7 days after jab, but didn't test pcr positive. Hello? But they had covid symptoms. The government needs to be shut down, fire everyone. Then lets do battle with those corrupt fat idiots

[–] 1 pt

What are those covid symptoms you talk about? Flu like synptoms?

[–] 2 pts

yes. so, it's wrong to call them covid symptoms. They got the shot, then their immune system was triggered beyond what is considered a side effect, but short of pneumonia. But they weren't included b/c no pcr positive test result. what a fucking scam. more technical blabla here: PCR tests are worthless: https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/archivos_pdf/scam-confirmed-pcr.pdf

[–] -1 pt

Asking retarded questions like a fucking moron, that's the first symptom

Now shut the fuck up stupid