Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

109

(post is archived)

[–] • 6 pts

Even if they did work, I would still hate them used in public. They anonymize and dehumanize us, which, along with making us unhealthier is what they actually want.
You must publicly display your subservience or face consequences. It's tyranny. I'd have no problem with letting sheeple follow the latest celebrity shepherd off a cliff but this new push for 'equity' over 'equality' is naked communism.

[–] • 4 pts

solution: wear a mask while shooting up a synogouge.

[–] • 0 pt

I mean... you've got a point...

[–] • 5 pts (edited )

ITS WORSE!!! In 11 hospital site studies in asia, MASKS CAUSE more Sars-2 (Covid-19) infections!

Faucci and others say that mask wearers get Covid-19 because they fiddle and touch their face more.

No one knows why, but wearing a mask increases covid-19 for the wearers.

MASKS are worse than USELESS.

paper "A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers"

Results: The rates of all infection outcomes were highest in the cloth mask arm, with the rate of ILI statistically significantly higher in the cloth mask arm (relative risk (RR)=13.00, 95% CI 1.69 to 100.07) compared with the medical mask arm. Cloth masks also had significantly higher rates of ILI compared with the control arm. An analysis by mask use showed ILI (RR=6.64, 95% CI 1.45 to 28.65) and laboratory- confirmed virus (RR=1.72, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.94) were significantly higher in the cloth masks group compared with the medical masks group

And higher than the NO MASK group.

Masks CAUSE more covid-19 in large studies.

[–] • 1 pt

There is no Covid-19 and saying that anyone “has” an imaginary illness is presuming that the testing kits work to detect a new virus, which they do not.

[–] • 1 pt

ITS WORSE!!! In 11 hospital site studies in asia, MASKS CAUSE more Sars-2 (Covid-19) infactions!

jewflu is real

[–] • 0 pt

The difference isn't enough to show masks cause more covid, but that is a reasonable hypothesis from the data. It mostly illustrates that there is no correlation between wearing masks and the spread of the virus. The conclusion from that is masks definitely do not work.

[–] • 3 pts

masks don't work against a virus that doesn't even exist

Have fun with the bacterial pneumonia.

[–] • 2 pts

Are you sure that masks will stop the spread?

"Stop the spread?"

-- Stonetoss

[–] • 2 pts

Masks work for what they're supposed to do, humiliate and signal submission. That's why women are the biggest advocates and social enforcers

[–] • 2 pts

Someone needs to simply put up pictures of people in slave masks. It’s not anything that could be considered a hate crime or whatever and it doesn’t even need a caption to get the point across.

[–] • 1 pt

They're also helping to normalise obscuring your identity in public. Pretty handy if you're a cop or antifag.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

They not only don't work, they make you

[–] • 2 pts

It’s weird that people with immunity, recovered or vaccinated, wear the masks.

[–] • 1 pt

Because the mandates are blunt and have no room for nuance.

[–] • 2 pts

Masks are the real sick makers, not the so-called 'pandemic'.

[–] • 1 pt

Masks increase the risk of infection of any type of disease or cold. The public is not trained on how to apply masks. And even if they were, masks you can make out of literally anything dont do shit.

[–] • 1 pt

It fails to mention the Smokey The Bear Effect.

If someone is actually sick, instead of them staying home in order to prevent making others sick, they put on a mask and go out. Because they've been told that if they wear a mask, they won't make others sick.

It is a perfect example of the Smokey The Bear Effect. They made masks mandatory with the intent of stopping the spread of viruses, but the result was that it spread the virus more.

[–] • 0 pt

It fails to mention the Smokey The Bear Effect.

Kinda how like people came to believe drill sergeant hats prevent forest fires?

[–] • 0 pt

What? You do know what the Smokey The Bear Effect is, don't you?

The Smokey The Bear example of the effect is somewhat complicated. The best example of the effect is what happened in China in the late 50s, early 60s -

They wanted to increase crop production. They noticed that birds eat the crop. Which is 100% true. Birds eat the crop.

So they killed as many birds as they could. Because if there were no more birds eating the crop, then they'd have more crop. And that's 100% true.... on it's own.

But what else happens? Birds eat bugs. And without the birds eating the bugs, the insect population exploded. Instead of crop production increasing, it instead decreased by 70%. A farmer that grew enough food to feed 100 families, now only grew enough for 30. 40 million people didn't just go hungry. 40 million people starved to death.

Yes it is true that masks prevent your spittle from hitting others in the face when you talk. It is 100% true that masks limit the distance that you breathe out viruses. Those are 100% true. 100% UNDENIABLY TRUE!! Just like it's 100% undeniably true that if you kill all the birds, then there won't be any birds eating your crop.

But other things happen when people wear masks. They're more likely to go out when sick or potentially sick, believing that it's ok because they have a mask on. They touch the mask with their hands, transferring everything on their hands onto the mask to eventually be breathed in. Viruses get sucked into the mask in one place or area, transported to other places and areas, where they are blown out of the mask spreading viruses that much more.

It's the Smokey The Bear Effect. The intent makes perfect sense on its own..... On it's own it makes perfect sense.... On it's own it is 100% undeniably true and makes perfect sense...... But due to other outside factors, you end up with the exact opposite result.

[–] • 0 pt

That comment of mine was just a shitpost, but thanks for the background.

How does smokey the bear come into it though? Did that campaign result in people being less careful with camp fires somehow? Or did the massive crackdown on forest fires make the ones that did happen more catastrophic?

[–] • 0 pt

Damn! They shoah'd this article!

Load more (2 replies)