WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

985

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 5 pts

Considering that we evolved as omnivores, there's not much surprise.

[–] 4 pts

I'm impressed that smallpond is posting articles that contain inconvenient truths. He'll be onboard the genocide-for-ecology wagon soon.

[–] 3 pts

It's just one study... and food science is notoriously complex. Still, it's topical.

[–] 1 pt
[–] 0 pt

is the guy to chat to. I think the cost of meat/dairy should reflect the associated environmental costs - hence we should eat less. I don't see the need to reduce my intake to zero and be a vegan.

[–] 3 pts
[–] 1 pt

Interesting, I'll check it out

[–] 1 pt

It's a cross-sectional study, meaning it's a snapshot in time, meaning you can't prove cause and effect.

More here: https://invidio.us/watch?v=dCPN7DKEj1Y

[–] 1 pt

What's your take on this?

[–] 1 pt (edited )

I more-or-less agree, food science is pretty fickle and it's just one study in one country.

Edit: regarding the video, it's obviously a rebuttal from someone with a clear vested interest, but he brings up a few good points. I don't appreciate him saying or implying that the study's authors are saying 'vegetarianism causes disease' - because they're not. Very useful to hear from the other-side. If you really want to know more, you're going to have to do more in-depth research.