Considering that we evolved as omnivores, there's not much surprise.
I'm impressed that smallpond is posting articles that contain inconvenient truths. He'll be onboard the genocide-for-ecology wagon soon.
It's just one study... and food science is notoriously complex. Still, it's topical.
Actually it's not just one, this stuff is all over the internet:
https://thetab.com/uk/2017/02/16/vegetarians-unhealthy-mentally-disturbed-says-new-research-33067
https://www.acsh.org/news/2017/11/10/vegetarian-men-are-more-depressed-are-steaks-treatment-12129
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/02/well/eat/good-vegan-bad-vegan.html
https://paleoleap.com/vegetarianism-bad-environment/
https://www.thehealthyhomeeconomist.com/vegetarianism-is-not-healthy/
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/vegan-betrayal-the-myths-vs-the-realities-of-a-plants-only-diet/
...all mentioning research that says vegan/vegetarian diets are either no better (or worse) than the omnivore approach, or debunking the other claims of the anti-meat crowd. The above is just a small sampling, found in under ten minutes of searching....plenty more where this came from.
is the guy to chat to. I think the cost of meat/dairy should reflect the associated environmental costs - hence we should eat less. I don't see the need to reduce my intake to zero and be a vegan.
Interesting, I'll check it out
It's a cross-sectional study, meaning it's a snapshot in time, meaning you can't prove cause and effect.
More here: https://invidio.us/watch?v=dCPN7DKEj1Y
What's your take on this?
I more-or-less agree, food science is pretty fickle and it's just one study in one country.
Edit: regarding the video, it's obviously a rebuttal from someone with a clear vested interest, but he brings up a few good points. I don't appreciate him saying or implying that the study's authors are saying 'vegetarianism causes disease' - because they're not. Very useful to hear from the other-side. If you really want to know more, you're going to have to do more in-depth research.
(post is archived)