Reasonable answer, but real world data is often incomplete, and time is limited. From your previous claims it goes without saying that NASA's objective scientific analysis is far superior to yours.
real world data is often incomplete, and time is limited.
This has nothing to do with NASA's practices. They are intentionally dishonest when it comes to the subject of climate change, regardless of the "completeness" of the data.
You don't know they are intentionally dishonest. You're a fool who lacks basic reasoning skills. Who tells you what to believe?
Based on scientific evidence man-made climate change does not exist. Therefore, if NASA claims that it does exist, they are being dishonest.
No, I will not break down all the evidence for you here. Look it up and be objective. Come to your own conclusions. Don't keep sucking NASA's dick.
(post is archived)