Sorry, my reply to this comment should have been addressed to .

If that's why you're implying that I'm an ungrateful prick, I now see where you're coming from. Thanks for the ping.

Hey. You seem to be moving in the wrong direction, having gone from posting refuted bullshit from 6 years ago, to refuted bullshit from 11 years ago. Are we getting lies from the last century next?

I remember this documentary when it first came out, and you sheep jumped on board. Have a read of the where it explains how they were forced to correct lies about volcano output and presented incorrect temperature data.

It also mentions this bizarre ruling by the British media regulator Ofcom:

However, the regulator said that because "the link between human activity and global warming... became settled before March 2007", in parts 1–4 the audience was not "materially misled so as to cause harm or offence".[67] According to Ofcom the program caused no harm because "the discussion about the causes of global warming was to a very great extent settled by the date of broadcast", meaning that climate change was no longer a matter of political controversy.[68]

So because global warming was obviously settled by 2007, they can't have misled anyone. Well you're living proof they were wrong.