The breakdown of 1/3, 1/3 and 1/3 seems way too convenient. I wonder what evidence they have to back up those nice figures. Blaming climate change on 1/3 of the wobble seems too SJWish. I read years ago that the earth wobbles because of moving magma, and shifting gravitational effect within our solar system especially from the moon, which has an elliptical orbit that varies continuously. Which seems more correct?
The breakdown of 1/3, 1/3 and 1/3 seems way too convenient. I wonder what evidence they have to back up those nice figures. Blaming climate change on 1/3 of
the wobble seems too SJWish. I read years ago that the earth wobbles because of moving magma, and shifting gravitational effect within our solar system especially from the moon, which has an elliptical orbit that varies continuously. Which seems more correct?
I vote magma and the moon myself. They can't write anything nowadays without some claim to global warming. It's a shame. Science has in many ways sold out to liberal politics, just as so many other once trustworthy institutions have.
I vote magma and the moon myself. They can't write anything nowadays without some claim to global warming. It's a shame. Science has in many ways sold out to liberal politics, just as so many other once trustworthy institutions have.
(post is archived)