WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

441

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Baudrillard was the best of the Frenchies from that era. Simulacra and Simulation is a must-read.

[–] 0 pt

You’re assuming people with sub 120 iq can comprehend it or that people wouldn’t throw it on the ground they see his wiki page that calls him a marxist.

[–] 0 pt

I think that goes for a lot of French thought. Some of them were absolute Leftist trash (Badiou and Levinas), but some of the philosophy coming from France has to be confronted nonetheless. Sartre. Baudrillard. Lacan.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Foucault was a complete nigger only correct about power. Liberalism is a disease. It creates philosophy like this. The thing you can take form this is: take what is true and throw the rest away. Also you can see the explicit anti-white hatred from these philosophers. It’s so funny how they end up being right about the underlying mechanism but they alway point it in the wrong direction. I remember a passage from “simulacra and simulation” where it says “when the colonists met the natives they either had to admit that their god wasn’t universal (talking about christ) or that they had to exterminate them.” It’s like swimming in a lake of shit looking for a gold nugget. The marxists are literally useful idiots for critique but their solutions are always just inhuman shit.