>Not a Qtard doubt. you didn't bother to go and verify yourself, and you came up with another random tinfoil without checking either. stop doing this, you are wasting everyone's time > I’m not saying this post is true good they have a bank there... https://www.factcheck.org/2022/03/rothschild-co-has-office-in-russia-contrary-to-conspiracy-claim-on-social-media/ other sources: https://news.knowledia.com/US/en/articles/rothschild-and-co-has-office-in-russia-contrary-to-conspiracy-claim-on-9b297000d2798128a69d0950d807ab5ca80e3c4d https://www.vishwadha.news/no-evidence-putin-banned-rothschild-family-from-russia/ https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2022/03/03/fact-check-no-evidence-putin-banned-rothschild-family-russia/6979745001/ https://edmo.eu/2022/02/28/war-in-ukraine-the-fact-checked-disinformation-detected-in-the-eu/ https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2020/06/fact-check-putin-did-not-ban-rothschilds-from-russia.html >but the site you linked literally fact checked that nine pages of a Pfizer document listing thousands of vaccine-related side effects does NOT exist, because the document actually calls them “adverse events,” not side effects. Yes because everything is reported in those. If I get a jab and the next day my big toe aches, it goes in the report. If someone notices that everyone is getting achy toes after the jab THEN they can start a verifiable investigation into toe pain. That's the whole point of collecting unverified data **Anyone with internet access can add a report to the VAERS list of reports.** the list only provides a tally of unverified notes about any health event people experience after they are vaccinated. You are not supposed to draw conclusions from that, it's a starting point for other studies, not an end report in itself.