![The Two Most Contrasting Religions [543x894 - 217KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/uQYI6p.jpg){kind=link}
Christianity is a jewish religion!!!
This is why kikes post that kikery.
>Christianity is a jewish religion!!!
This is why kikes post that kikery.
https://www.sefaria.org/Sanhedrin.55a?lang=bi
Help me find the first quote on the left, it's not in 54b so far as I can tell. Read that they hold men liable for sleeping with boys but that a boy who is under 9 and passive (raped) is not guilty of a crime, just the raper.
https://www.sefaria.org/Sanhedrin.55a?lang=bi
Help me find the first quote on the left, it's not in 54b so far as I can tell. Read that they hold men liable for sleeping with boys but that a boy who is under 9 and passive (raped) is not guilty of a crime, just the raper.
http://www.halakhah.com/sanhedrin/sanhedrin_54.html
"Rab said: Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. Samuel said: Pederasty with a child below three years is not treated as with a child above that."
(footnotes) "I.e., Rab makes nine years the minimum; but if one committed sodomy with a child of lesser age, no guilt is incurred. Samuel makes three the minimum. At nine years a male attains sexual matureness. Lev. XVIII, 22. Thus the point of comparison is the sexual matureness of woman, which is reached at the age of three."
http://www.halakhah.com/sanhedrin/sanhedrin_54.html
"Rab said: **Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty** with a child above that. Samuel said: Pederasty with a child below three years is not treated as with a child above that."
(footnotes)
"I.e., Rab makes nine years the minimum; but if one committed sodomy with a child of lesser age, no guilt is incurred. Samuel makes three the minimum.
At nine years a male attains sexual matureness.
Lev. XVIII, 22. Thus the point of comparison is the **sexual matureness of woman, which is reached at the age of three**."
The start of Sanhedrin 54b between the two websites doesn't start the same. Just trying to suss out my sources so that when I call jews Talmudic devjls, I'll be informed
The start of Sanhedrin 54b between the two websites doesn't start the same. Just trying to suss out my sources so that when I call jews Talmudic devjls, I'll be informed
Mary gave birth to Jesus at 13-14. Jesus had a brother, James. to my knowledge, there is no age of consent given in the Bible (please correct me if I'm wrong here, I'd be interested to hear what it is).
Mary gave birth to Jesus at 13-14. Jesus had a brother, James.
to my knowledge, there is no age of consent given in the Bible (please correct me if I'm wrong here, I'd be interested to hear what it is).
looks like some sources say 20, some say things like "marriageable age', and some say it was the onset of puberty (after ~12); Ezekiel 16:2-8 “Your breasts were formed and your hair was grown..the time of love” (slideplayer.com). Here is a bunch (discover-the-truth.com)on the subject
looks like some sources say 20, some say things like "marriageable age', and some say it was the onset of puberty (after ~12); [Ezekiel 16:2-8 “Your breasts were formed and your hair was grown..the time of love” ](https://slideplayer.com/slide/6298545/21/images/24/Ezekiel+16%3A2-8.jpg). Here is a [bunch ](https://discover-the-truth.com/2020/06/10/the-age-of-marriage-and-sex-in-the-bible/)on the subject
Wiki : (en.wikipedia.org) "Out of the three major Abrahamic faiths, Christianity and Judaism are the two religions that diverge the most in theology and practice.
The historical interaction of Islam and Judaism started in the 7th century CE with the origin and spread of Islam. There are many common aspects between Islam and Judaism, and as Islam developed, it gradually became the major religion closest to Judaism. As opposed to Christianity, which originated from interaction between ancient Greek, Roman, and Hebrew cultures, Judaism is very similar to Islam in its fundamental religious outlook, structure, jurisprudence and practice"
[Wiki :](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparative_religion#Abrahamic_or_Western_Asian_religions) "Out of the three major Abrahamic faiths, **Christianity and Judaism are the two religions that diverge the most in theology and practice**.
The historical interaction of Islam and Judaism started in the 7th century CE with the origin and spread of Islam. There are many common aspects between Islam and Judaism, and **as Islam developed, it gradually became the major religion closest to Judaism**. As opposed to **Christianity, which originated from interaction between ancient Greek, Roman, and Hebrew cultures**, Judaism is very similar to Islam in its fundamental religious outlook, structure, jurisprudence and practice"
You should see Sanhedrin 55b:
>R. Joseph said: Come and hear! A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband's brother cohabits with her, she becomes his.
You should see Sanhedrin 55b:
>>R. Joseph said: Come and hear! **A maiden aged three years and a day** may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband's brother cohabits with her, she becomes his.
https://halakhah.com/sanhedrin/sanhedrin_55.html#PARTb
Rules for thee, none for me. Amirite?
Rules for thee, none for me. Amirite?
No.
Are you trying to imply kikes had anything to do with Christianity?
e:
(((this))) guy is though.
No.
Are you trying to imply kikes had anything to do with Christianity?
e:
((([this](https://poal.co/s/Religion/301650/c89e7c2d-1c6c-4d4b-a5b5-265d51739580#cmnts)))) guy is though.
Aren't they two completely separate and unrelated things?
Aren't they two completely separate and unrelated things?
Yes, also though Christianity is the most anti-jew ideology (faith) there is.
Yes, also though Christianity is the most anti-jew ideology (faith) there is.
That’s what it sounds like. Most people only fear the consequences of their actions. Even more so if it’s perceived to be from the entity that has an enormous power over you.
That’s what it sounds like. Most people only fear the consequences of their actions. Even more so if it’s perceived to be from the entity that has an enormous power over you.
Unfortunately, there have been so many fake quotes supposedly from the Talmud circulated around the Internet, that you can't trust any of them. Which is probably what the Jews circulating the fake quotes wanted.
Unfortunately, there have been so many fake quotes supposedly from the *Talmud* circulated around the Internet, that you can't trust any of them. Which is probably what the Jews circulating the fake quotes wanted.
The Talmud is a book of sophistry written by Pharisees going back to the time of Christ. It's basically written opinions of Rabbis who seek to nullify the scriptures found in the Tanakh and Torah or as you would say, the Bible.
The Talmud is a book of sophistry written by Pharisees going back to the time of Christ. It's basically written opinions of Rabbis who seek to nullify the scriptures found in the Tanakh and Torah or as you would say, the Bible.
1: male child less than 9 years of age is okay, but if you sleep with a male over that age, it's death. / you cannot sleep with an adult male (no mention of boys)
2: Sacrificing your sperm to Molech is permitted / making an offering of sperm to Molech is a death sentence (what about other gods?)
3: It's not a crime to curse you parents, unless you utter the true name of God, which is a death sentence / kill your kids if they curse you. ("you took away my Xbox Dad? fuck you!" / ""mom, stop, you are embarrassing me, you're so lame" - whelp, time to get the shotgun and put some buckshot in the back of my kid's head now <- a sane person, and loving parent)
4: This specific charm is permitted to influence spirits with / anyone who deals with spirits is to be killed (what about those who pray to Jesus, or consult the saints, or hail Mary, or take part in mass, or worship, or baptism or anywhere else they welcome the holy spirit into them and establish connection with god, or his angels, or his other subordinates? what about people who celebrate "familiar spirit", "charm", and "enchantment" related holidays? like Halloween? or Easter? or Christmas? or New Years? or Birthdays? - all would be dead by virtue of this passage, probably why early christians banned them all, TBH)
5: A woman who gets fucked by an animal can marry a priest, she's "wounded" (soiled goods) / men and women who fuck animals get killed (the animal too)
6: prostitution is okay, it's a gift, not wages (for purposes of taxation, I guess) / a woman cannot conduct prostitution as long as she lives with her father (I guess it's okay to be a whore if she's moved out)
7: You can use the true name of God as a curse, so long as you do in your head, and it is being applied to something that is not God (uttering it aloud or thinking to but directly cursing God is both a death sentence) / you can't do it under even that circumstance, merely thinking the name of God as a curse, even if it's regarding something unrelated to God, is a death sentence
8: you can say that any promise you make in the future is invalid (meaning that you can break promises so long as you warn the person you make them with beforehand that you should not be expected to hold yourself to them) / you must do everything you say you will do, or be put to death (what if you promise something but it turns out to not be possible? what f the person you promised to do something for no longer wants you to do it? what if the thing you said you would do turns out to be a far worse idea than you originally planned? what f you promise to do something, then fail and don't have another chance? <- every one of these cases is a death sentence)
9: ten men each strike a victim, since no one could determine who made the killing blow, all are to be found innocent (retarded) / if you strike a man and it causes him to die, you are put to death (but what if you are one of ten men, and it is not possible to determine who dealt the killing blow?)
The laws say what they say, they don't say what you interpret them to say. the implications on either end aren't appealing. why not just abandon religion altogether, or just make your own religion?
#1: male child less than 9 years of age is okay, but if you sleep with a male over that age, it's death. / you cannot sleep with an adult male (no mention of boys)
#2: Sacrificing your sperm to Molech is permitted / making an offering of sperm to Molech is a death sentence (what about other gods?)
#3: It's not a crime to curse you parents, unless you utter the true name of God, which is a death sentence / kill your kids if they curse you. ("you took away my Xbox Dad? fuck you!" / ""mom, stop, you are embarrassing me, you're so lame" - whelp, time to get the shotgun and put some buckshot in the back of my kid's head now <- a sane person, and loving parent)
#4: This specific charm is permitted to influence spirits with / anyone who deals with spirits is to be killed (what about those who pray to Jesus, or consult the saints, or hail Mary, or take part in mass, or worship, or baptism or anywhere else they welcome the holy spirit into them and establish connection with god, or his angels, or his other subordinates? what about people who celebrate "familiar spirit", "charm", and "enchantment" related holidays? like Halloween? or Easter? or Christmas? or New Years? or Birthdays? - all would be dead by virtue of this passage, probably why early christians banned them all, TBH)
#5: A woman who gets fucked by an animal can marry a priest, she's "wounded" (soiled goods) / men and women who fuck animals get killed (the animal too)
#6: prostitution is okay, it's a gift, not wages (for purposes of taxation, I guess) / a woman cannot conduct prostitution as long as she lives with her father (I guess it's okay to be a whore if she's moved out)
#7: You can use the true name of God as a curse, so long as you do in your head, and it is being applied to something that is not God (uttering it aloud or thinking to but directly cursing God is both a death sentence) / you can't do it under even that circumstance, merely thinking the name of God as a curse, even if it's regarding something unrelated to God, is a death sentence
#8: you can say that any promise you make in the future is invalid (meaning that you can break promises so long as you warn the person you make them with beforehand that you should not be expected to hold yourself to them) / you must do everything you say you will do, or be put to death (what if you promise something but it turns out to not be possible? what f the person you promised to do something for no longer wants you to do it? what if the thing you said you would do turns out to be a far worse idea than you originally planned? what f you promise to do something, then fail and don't have another chance? <- every one of these cases is a death sentence)
#9: ten men each strike a victim, since no one could determine who made the killing blow, all are to be found innocent (retarded) / if you strike a man and it causes him to die, you are put to death (but what if you are one of ten men, and it is not possible to determine who dealt the killing blow?)
The laws say what they say, they don't say what you interpret them to say. the implications on either end aren't appealing. why not just abandon religion altogether, or just make your own religion?
You copy pasted from some source and then changed some of the words.
You copy pasted from some source and then changed some of the words.
But I didn't. I wrote it all, just now. It's 100% original.
But I didn't. I wrote it all, just now.
It's 100% original.
Sanhedrin is a book of laws and arguments back and forth to define those laws based on the writings in the other books you're referencing on the right(except for matthew). It's literally like watching a courtroom drama rhetoric to define what is and isn't acceptable.
Sanhedrin is a book of laws and arguments back and forth to define those laws based on the writings in the other books you're referencing on the right(except for matthew). It's literally like watching a courtroom drama rhetoric to define what is and isn't acceptable.
Where's the counter argument against the kiddie diddling? We never seem to get that part. Just the argument for it.
Where's the counter argument against the kiddie diddling? We never seem to get that part. Just the argument for it.
[Rabbi 1: adults can fuck 3 year olds]
[Rabbi 2: adults can fuck 9 year olds]
[Rabbi 1: adults can fuck 3 year olds]
[Rabbi 2: adults can fuck 9 year olds]
Oh. So they were arguing the minutae of kiddie diddling, not that immorality of it.
Oh. So they were arguing the minutae of kiddie diddling, not that immorality of it.
(post is archived)