Average intelligence levels of different social groups are going to be the cause of our destruction. Higher IQ whites are under sustained, unrelenting attack, and are being denied jobs and educations based on their race. They are being strongly influenced to have no children, or fewer children. Meanwhile the lowest IQ group, the niggers, is being supported and given advantages of every kind, enabling niggers to take jobs they cannot possibly perform correctly or attend universities from which they cannot possibly earn legitimate degrees. This enables niggers to have children out of wedlock with no penalties. The consequence of this policy is obvious and inevitable -- society as a whole becomes debased and degraded. There is no other possible outcome.
This has been known since Darwin. Francis Bacon even invented the statistical methods used today (regression analysis, etc.) trying to quantify this problem. He came to the conclusion that the only way white people could sustainably survive was by creating a new religion based around the idea of Eugenics.
It's not like this would be taught in schools, so not really mainstream knowledge. Advocating eugenics, I mean c'mon.
It was taught in schools worldwide during the first half of the 20th century.
There are actually biologically inherent reasons governed by genetics that these things are occurring and while explaining this is sort of tedious, I could give it a shot if you'd like.
Whites are smarter and therefore more competent. This means they need to buy few genetic lottery tickets in order to have their genes move on. Nogs are dumber and therefore less competent, meaning they need to buy more genetic lottery tickets in order for their genes to move on. A big reason for importation of ferals is the need to have more and cheaper workers. You can thank the boomers and their retarded parents for this, who are the reason for outsourcing of manufacturing, which they then reimport to us... giving our jobs to other countries. Then we let women work, who voted for welfare and more ferals...
There's more to this. I could explain more if you want.
This is correct. It is also why blacks have a rape reproductive strategy and whites do not.
Do it. I love reading it. Please?
Selection pressures have morphed over time. It used to just be about who's big and strong. In the technical age, things have differed a bit. Clearly women still want big and strong men and men still want youthful women with a golden hip to waist ratio. But there's more to it now. The "genetic brain" of our species now also accounts for population numbers in given geographical locations. The overarching anthropological/biological theory for this is fascinating, but I don't recall where to point you to in order to hear more or remember enough of the details to lay it all out succinctly, but I can give it a whirl:
Total Resources + Resource Refining - Consumption + Rate of Resource Renewal = Given Population of a Particular Geographical Area
The amount of resources and the geographical placement are predominant contributors to size and orientation of a population. If you put a species of highly competent (intelligent) individuals in a resource rich environment, they'll inevitably have less kids over time, mostly for reasons I already explained (see above: "lottery tickets"). This effects rates at which manufacturing can be conducted, which affects local economies, which effects demographics, all of which contribute to particular birth rates. This is why our ancestors always had slaves. There were always fewer royalty than subjects. The relationship used to be much more symbiotic than parasitic. No matter how you look at the current dynamic, it's offset. But you can read more about the realities of feudalism on your own.
Feel free to ask more questions.
They know this and in every public reference to population, they will always be the "poor, downtrodden, oppressed minority."
Watched something here probably wherein the talking-head mentioned "80% minority Detroit" or something similar. Since when is an overwhelming majority still considered a minority? When they're still considered 5/8th of a person.
So long as it’s a democracy yes
Natural nor sexual selection do not behave normally in modern humans. Nobody really dies due to being unfit (whether low IQ or otherwise) because our entire society is geared towards taking resources from the most fit to sustain the least fit. Everyone has about the same number of children and mate selection is complete chaos. As of last 1-2 centuries, I would not expect there to be any selective pressure favoring high IQ. In fact, our entire society is built to punish the fit to sustain the unfit. So I would expect that from now on IQ should decrease until it hits the absolute minimum necessary to survive. The resources will be redirected to maximizing procreation. So people will get dumber, less athletic, enter puberty earlier and become more promiscuous. This will go on until humans can just barely survive even with the systems and technology inherited from our day. Then as those systems eventually degrade or become insufficient due to changing environments, the degenerated humans will be unable to improve them, and the result will be a population collapse. Such a collapse could in theory provide the selective pressure to create a fitter population again, although it could also result in extinction.
It is tempting to consider that an elite class could develop that does not interbreed with commoners and has a culture of strict meritocracy among themselves. However I doubt this will happen, because elites today believe most of their own bullshit and can't stop their kids from becoming degenerate.
On the bright side, this stuff will take at least several generations, so likely we won't see the true Idiocracy in our lifetimes.
(post is archived)