Some dictionaries are beginning to actually change their official definition of the word "vaccine."
For example, the traditional definition:
A preparation of a weakened or killed pathogen, such as a bacterium or virus, or of a portion of the pathogen's structure that upon administration to an individual stimulates antibody production or cellular immunity against the pathogen but is incapable of causing severe infection.
The new alternative "b" definition in Merriam-Webster dictionary:
A preparation of genetic material (such as a strand of synthesized messenger RNA) that is used by the cells of the body to produce an antigenic substance (such as a fragment of virus spike protein)
OK, so then I used MW to try to find out what an antigenic substance is:
any substance (such as an immunogen or a hapten) foreign to the body that evokes an immune response either alone or after forming a complex with a larger molecule (such as a protein) and that is capable of binding with a product (such as an antibody or T cell) of the immune response.
Now I see a direct contradiction. If the so-called vaccine causes the body to produce a substance, then that substance cannot be considered "foreign to the body," now can it?
So our mutagen "vaccine" admittedly causes the body to attack itself. Please explain to me again why I should want this (I definitely don't).
The CDC also changed their definition of the word. Talk about your massive world wide conspiracy to enslave the planet and kill billions....
Please explain to me again why I should want this (I definitely don't).
You don't want your own body attacking itself? What do you have against a swollen heart and blood clots? You sound like a white supremacist and a racist
(post is archived)