But why dont you reread the JH newsletter article
JH struck it down for wrongthink
Is your position that there is indeed a high covid death rate, ie that covid is what Fauci and his peers claim?
either agree with me or agree with fauci
False choice. I believe that covid has a fatality rate maybe 50 times higher than the annual flu. I believe that Fauci created this vieus by funding the Wuhan virlogy lab and that he has been sowing disinformation about effective treatments and pushing ineffective quarantine measures to exploit a political opportunity
Now, address the innaccuracies I have pointed out about the JH article. Is your silence an implicit admission that Briand abused the numbers to make misleading claims? I encourage you to look at her math.
I personally think it is irrelevant whether she was struck down for wrongthink. She is a data analyst and she has misinterpreted the data, seemingly purposely. That is bad bad bad.
Why do you care what her position is if her purpose is to analyze the data and she is doing it improperly? Look at the math man!
I believe that covid has a fatality rate maybe 50 times higher than the annual flu. I believe that Fauci created this vieus by funding the Wuhan virlogy lab
So what of the reports that the flu cases are next to nonexistent, as they're most all being counted as covid?
Also, what virus? There is no valid test for covid, the gov't conceded that it was even using the invalid "test" incorrectly, and no government health agency has isolated the virus yet. Not even China and the USA, which throws a real wrench into the contention that Fauci had this cooked up starting in 2014 or so.
Briand abused the numbers to make misleading claims?
What would the motivation behind this have been? How would Hopkins have released something so incorrect, isn't all science only officially science if it has been extensively "peer reviewed"?
(post is archived)