![38, Wants Kids Someday [1080x1080 - 501KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/PRTwWY.jpg){kind=link}
> Everyone around was doing it, what other choice was there?
Now you're getting it. The environment is massively important to culture. One of the greatest tragedies of individualism was to abandon the world around us. Cultural zeitgeists don't just happen. Systems shape them. When multigenerational households and arranged marriages are the norm (Whites before 1910), the family's unique and timeless history, culture, heritage, values, and stigmas are passed down within the family unit. When you have John moving thousands of miles every few years to chase a job paying more than he needs, and Susie doing even more moving around to chase miles of all shades of cock, you get what settles into the nuclear family via what normies call "love". Then, they complain about not being able to find love as most children are raised by single mothers.
It's patriarchy or clown world. Anything in-between slides to the latter within a century.
When you have John moving thousands of miles every few years to chase a job paying more than he needs,
Please tell me about one of these illusive jobs that pay more than one needs to raise a large family, something like that is nearly impossible to get.
Tell me a few things about how your forefathers lived a century ago.
In ways that would be illegal today and without women and hoards of non whites in the work force lowering wages.
Well yes but also remember we didn't have as many niggers, faggots, hardly any illegals, it wasn't anywhere near as "diverse" as it used to be. We weren't giving unlimited gibs to niggers and shitskins to help them outbreed and replace us. Our society was White, our culture was White, we kept what we earned, the cost of living was low, women stayed home to raise kids, a man could provide for his entire family working a modest job. In today's world, many men have no choice but to move in order to have a fighting chance of getting ANY job much less a job that can pay a living salary just to cover his ass much less to raise a family. This is where things are going, in a very ugly direction, and many lives, hopes and dreams have been ruined chasing blindly the path of the WOKE.
You confuse the cause with the (reinforcing) effect. The shitskins and fags weren't dictating culture before the Immigration act of 1965 and the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The politicians lied, of course, but women voted these policies into effect. Now, the shitskins reinforce the effect of giving women a vote.
What gave women a vote? Well, just look at the (((leaders))) of first wave feminism. (((They))) knew what they were doing when they instituted age of consent (age of marriage) laws and women's suffrage by breaking up multigenerational households and encouraging dating and love marriage. Dating wasn't even a practice before 1890. By 1910 it was the norm. They were losing in 1890, but by 1910, first wave feminists were winning.
>a man could provide for his entire family working a modest job
This requires defeating female hypergamy with arranged marriage. It is indeed inexpensive to raise a family in a farm off the grid. The big problem is hypergamy, like when women expect the fleeting postwar salaries and standards of living that came with the world eating out of the palm of America's hand instead of 1890 homesteading.
Well yes, I am aware of those two acts it's simply the effects of those acts have had tons of damage to our folk. We do indeed have a long way to go and yes the filthy jews came here in the late 1800s and within a short period caused a great bit of damage to us. Homesteading reminds me of the western film Shane.
(post is archived)