You confuse the cause with the (reinforcing) effect. The shitskins and fags weren't dictating culture before the Immigration act of 1965 and the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The politicians lied, of course, but women voted these policies into effect. Now, the shitskins reinforce the effect of giving women a vote. What gave women a vote? Well, just look at the (((leaders))) of first wave feminism. (((They))) knew what they were doing when they instituted age of consent (age of marriage) laws and women's suffrage by breaking up multigenerational households and encouraging dating and love marriage. Dating wasn't even a practice before 1890. By 1910 it was the norm. They were losing in 1890, but by 1910, first wave feminists were winning. >>a man could provide for his entire family working a modest job This requires defeating female hypergamy with arranged marriage. It is indeed inexpensive to raise a family in a farm off the grid. The big problem is hypergamy, like when women expect the fleeting postwar salaries and standards of living that came with the world eating out of the palm of America's hand instead of 1890 homesteading.