Nothing could go wrong. Frankly, I'd trust cells that stay fresh over eggs that just sit "on the shelf" in the ovaries for decades, gradually drying out.
I'd trust the NIH to do nothing except try to discourage men from having kids.
If Barron Trump has autism, it's more likely due to Melania being 36 at the time of her first kid's birth than it is that The Donald was 60.
... but there is a higher risk. Demonstrably so.
Just because the cell divides? Skin cells are constantly regenerating yet folks aren't catching deadly cancers from it left and right.
There’s a serious difference between cancer and cell aging.
There is a correlation between age of the father and diagnoses of the kid - like it or not, it’s there.
And I truly think you’re underestimating the rate of DNA/replication damage. Have a look at retinoblastoma and see how it actually functions.
Human cells can only replicate a certain number of times and then they become prone to error like saving a lossy file too many times. Cells eventually either stop replacing (cell senescence, old age) or they go bonkers because of a copy error (usually cancer)
Face it dude, your sperm is sub parr. Any kids you have at this point will be schizos and retards because of genetic degradation. As opposed to kids you had earlier who just inherited it. XD
will be schizos and retards
Then they'll do great over on Wall Street Bets, especially if they get vaccinated and so gain the investing super-power of weaponized autism.
Thats true!
Fuck off jew
(post is archived)