Exterior steel frame tube column verses "Durable aluminum alloy and composite structure" Boeing 767, absent evidence of plane debris and correct Engine model on claimed find.
Tower 7
Eyewitness accounts of no planes, explosions instead.
Modified and difficult to locate CNN chopper footage over the Hudson of the infamous "nose through tower" shot. The camera operator is the author of a book in Video Composting Tech, that details how to use a vertical backdrop for live editing of CGI. If you GIF stablizer the video you'll see the planes path does not become smooth as it would if it was captured at the same time as the rest of the scene. Instead you'll find the plane is unstable after stabilizing the video, because it was an added layer effect on a live capture backdrop. The entire nose through tower fuckup is compelling.
jews, thermite and fireproofing wall mossad op
I've found the Energy Weapon theory interesting however as far as i can tell there were no planes involved that day. Yes the people were taken, to where i haven't a clue.
CGI/Photoshop has become one of their most powerful levers and still many won't ask the big question honestly.
i've read hearing an airplane at 500mph, 500 feet above you would be like "rock concert levels"... it would make your ears bleed (exaggerating)
Any one that has ever seen the nose of a big plane like a 747 after hitting a large bird while in flight, and seen the damage that results from that collision, can only laugh at the idea that the nose of that plane survived going through a steel framed building intact.
(post is archived)