This is very well done.
It's a nice painting. And that's kinda the problem with all of his paintings, they're just "nice paintings" in a style that was popular a hundred years earlier. He'd probably have done reasonably well selling them in the park, but even if the art academies hadn't been cucked they wouldn't have gained him any renown.
Isn't the point of an art school to help you improve and expand your horizons? Seems to me he was more than talented enough to get in.
Sure, but they're always going to prefer someone pushing in (what they see as) a promising new direction.
At the time art was in crisis because it's traditional niche had been almost completely replaced by photography. No one was interested in faithful reproductions of reality any more, photographers could do that better and cheaper. It took them a while to work out how to do interesting stylistic things that photographers couldn't, but by then most art academies were jewed beyond belief.
(post is archived)