Let me tell you why humans are hardcoded to offshore decision making, their opinions, thoughts etc. And why they choose who they will let do it.
It's not a stupid mishape of human's it's actually very smart. What's not very smart is no one is aware of it.
In AI, aka simulated or intelligence duplicated, there exists something called the "heuristic". When we do decision making, it requires energy. It requires thought, it requires time; if we REALLY want to consider ALL the truths, possibilities and outcomes. So the mind (and AI systems) create a short cut system.
Here's and example of a heuristic - Imagine you're in the middle of a valley, surrounded by moutains. You CAN NOT see over the mountains. So you don't know which way to go. You HAVE to make an assumption and just try one. What do you go off by? If you're dumb, you just pick one, maybe one looks like a movie you once saw, who knows. Smarter people, maybe they'll consider the quickest to get over first so they can cycle them faster. Really smart, you might have a GPS, or have great memory and remember how tf you got there in the first place. Or know the stars etc.
The differences in how people chose which decision to make without perfect knowledge, are called heuristics.
Now in offloading your thoughts, decisions, beliefs / opinions etc. This is a heuristic at work. People look to "experts", "trusted individuals", "people who has risen on their merit" for quick downloads on decision making, opinions etc. In normal operating life, this is a very trustable high overall success shortcut.
The problem is the DS is literally scientific on their manipulation of the masses. They take advantage of this. Create a firewall of media and manufactured consent online to try to keep an above 50% consensus from figures that appear they are those who raised to "experts", "trusted individuals" etc. 50% is another one of those heuristics. If above 50% just believe something, then it's probably a "safe" belief to just download without double checking. When done on "expert" types, the download is near unshakable.
It's not a stupid mishape of human's it's actually very smart. What's not very smart is no one is aware of it.
Exactly.
It's an evolutionary strategy just as raping is. People might think that rapists are mutants or something but if they rape and they get offspring that way then their strategy worked (and that's why rape should be punished by death to cleanse the gene pool or their parasitic genes).
I agree, rape should be a capital offense...
If rape is an evolutionary strategy, then so are false accusations of rape. How many times has a woman falsely cried 'rape!' when her real motives were simply spite or to get herself out of trouble? Rapists should die, but false accusers must also face severe sanctions.
Good analysis, as a skeptic I take the longer route of going through multiple sources, I also go to the root of info provided by "trusted sources" to form my own opinions. This has been helpful in seeing through counterfeit information but most people don't put in this type of effort.
When people claim "common sense" they are literally claiming "common heuristic".
Heuristics have a funny "phenomenon" of smarter more effective ones spectacularly getting some things wrong, but overall getting way more, and way more important things 100% correct. That's where the bell curve heuristic people say HUR DUR Don't have common sense!
This is also why dumb people can often get a lot of things right that average people can't. The other (same) phenomenon of dumb heuristics getting overall more things wrong, but sometimes getting things right common sense / average heuristics don't.
as a skeptic
You have an additional heuristic that kicks in when you should or should not do a full analysis. And you have the smarts / brain power to do the full analysis.
That heuristic may be the short cut of ie, if MSM then do full analysis. Or "if looney asshole obvious liberal" then do full analysis. However it might have a hole in it ie, it might never kick if if the source appears to be from a right cultured appeared consensus.
So one might be, ie, susceptible to manufactured consent campaigns that appear within the "right's" culture style.
That's how heuristics work, they're based off of statistics. They have holes and things statistically slip through. Their point is to have a brain processing power cutoff threshold. What's the best decision making it can achieve with the minimal brain power needed. Because we can't operate crunching everything at full power and expense. Just not possible, for anyone.
This is quite true although in many cases even with sources I trust I still will go the extra mile and check sources depending on a few weighted factors like how much I care to know the accuracy or time I have since I'm aware of the bias slant ir defects in transmission every source of info can have.
ie, if MSM then do full analysis. Or "if looney asshole obvious liberal" then do full analysis. However it might have a hole in it ie, it might never kick if if the source appears to be from a right cultured appeared consensus.
Also, that's a whole lotta conditionals, brother 😂
At this point I’m fairly certain I make better decisions than 99.99% of people. Fuck the heuristic.
Heuristics is just a way to explain how this happens.
(post is archived)