This argument only works if you think having babies or being pregnant is a disease. So this argument would only work with baby murdering libtards. And he did not properly represent the argument. He'd needed to word his argument like this if he wanted it to be accurate "If there was a contraceptive vaccine that after taking it, it reduced pregnancy death complications by 9 times and reduced the likelihood you could get pregnant by 13-20 times ( depending on the study), and you still had to have your partner wear a condom when you have sex when the condom is not really proven to prevent pregnancy death, but around 7/100,000 may experience adverse health effects from the vaccine, would you still take it?"