If anyone is interested in some perspective of what he is talking about regarding the "Abrahamic" style versus the "heathen" style, you may really enjoy an interesting occult story . In some ways, it very much resembles what E. Micheal Jones is talking about with "Logos." Also, further to this eternal battle look to the Protocols and you'll see two ideological variables pressed against each other: GOLD and MORALITY (or VIRTUE). In the protocols, they say the dominant variable is GOLD (Protocol #1, paragraph 11):
The political has nothing in common with the moral. The ruler who is governed by the moral is not a skilled politician, and is therefore unstable on his throne. He who wishes to rule must have recourse both to cunning and to make-believe. Great national qualities, like frankness and honesty, are vices in politics, for they bring down rulers from their thrones more effectively and more certainly than the most powerful enemy. Such qualities must be the attributes of the kingdoms of the GOYIM, but we must in no wise be guided by them.
This, of course is only true for the Abrahamic groups when the dogma runs deep. However, Uncle Adolf stated in his memoirs (see Chapter 3 for anyone willing to look) that the rule of GOLD can be dissolved when urgency of life is placed before the masses (ie in crisis). So, from a core perspective, really VIRTUE is the more powerful variable. We can see from the Saturn Death Cult (link above) that:
... It is the conflict between the love of money and the love of justice. ...
I would though contend to say that the real battle is not BETWEEN these two variables, but instead to utilize BOTH variables in order to get the concepts of both SURVIVAL and PROSPERITY. These two ideas together are how great progress in society is made. Where pure virtue (or justice) is fine in a tribal or survival sense, and pure gold is a parasitic issue, one would need both together. So, the machine of civilization is operated and grown by utilizing both variables in a balance.
Here is another fantastic point he made about Abrahamic Dualism. For anyone interested, there is a fairly lengthy course . Basically, once you learn to see the Abrahamic style of argumentation, you'll see the dualistic traps everywhere. For example, good-vs-evil, black-vs-white, etc. If you take it all the way, you'll see how Cultural Marxism is a version of this on steroids. This is where "diversity is our strength" comes from, but indeed "diversity is (((their))) strength" and Unity and Harmony is our strength.
It was impossible for most of us to follow what he was saying after a while.. it just never ended, no time to process. He talked over both Derek and Jeremy several times
I got to the end of his time, and I think I get what you mean because he has momentum and definitely goes all over. I think he is clearly a HIGHLY productive person on a bullet train frequency. He also has shed a ton of false facts and is running on a core sense without a lot to weigh him down and clearly went all over the spectrum during the conversation. But, his message is very sharp. I'd like to summarize what I got here.
We have to keep waking ourselves up by SHEDDING the Abrahamic junk and becoming aware of our identities and love ourselves. Then we reach out to other community members to help them love themselves.
I gotta say, if I'm hearing him right then I agree. I believe the key to fixing Canada is in our awareness of our ethnic identities (tribes) and the nature (land) we reside. These two tenants are core to any group of old stock Canadians. Through our shared land, the various tribes will be strong enough to fight off parasitic globalists. We don't even have to change the laws to make this happen, because these globalist faggots in a way pushed the very buttons that can be used against them once all the tribes unite.
How to get the tribes to unite, lies in first loving ourselves and helping others love themselves. We have to reach out personally, not over these bullshit controlled social media platforms. Love thy neighbor as thou love thyself doesn't sound so bad after all I guess.
He is also correct that Logos is pre-abrahamic. I found it in Greek literature and it has history before that. It's in the New Testament of the bible, but the King James Version wrote it out so you have to go back to the oldest copies of Luke and John to see it, but for sure it is there (in Greek of course).
In the beginning, was the word, and the word was Logos.
Logos is this "Natural Law" he was talking about. Once you shed everything, and just operate with the couple of tiny principles, all of his ramblings make sense.
I'm about 1:47 behind because I had to pause it and run some errands. I'll say this, so far he is operating on a very constitutive level. Meaning, there are basic themes that are operating everything on every level, but it can sound like a different thing every time. It's like a whole album of songs that all sound different and when you break them down they are various combinations of a few different melodies.
This guy so far is totally plugged in. I'll keep listening and see if I can be of any assistance. I think he's a lot like me, in that I also never stop talking ...
(post is archived)