The thing is, banning seems pretty acceptable on Poal. Go through the site ban log, loads of accounts straight out banned. The culture here is very different to Voats. I doubt the admins will do anything about this, it doesn’t seem contrary to how the site is run. Guess you only get one shitpost in s/Qstorm, so better make it a good one.
You mean this site ban log?
https://poal.co/s/SiteBans/new
I'm not seeing what you're seeing.
I don't understand why some here want Poal to fail. We lost Voat. Ruqqus sucks. Everything else is being banned.
I want Poal to succeed.
No this site log
Scroll through, you can see all the bans.
https://poal.co/s/SiteBans/new
I'm not seeing what you're seeing.
Scroll through, it doesn’t seem that hard to get banned.
I don't understand why some here want Poal to fail. We lost Voat. Ruqqus sucks. Everything else is being banned.
I never said I want Poal to fail, I’m just pointing out that if you fuck around or piss off the admins, you will get banned. This isn’t Voat, and the culture is different.
I want Poal to succeed.
Me too, but there are some differences that should be acknowledged.
Didn't know about those logs. I'll check them later (middle of the night here.)
I'll just note I do see a lot of attacks on @AOU and I don't mean the faggy stuff I saw on Ruqqus. I hope this is all teething problems that will resolve over time.
Because Ruqqus sucks and we need Poal more than ever, especially now with the world the way it is.
It won't.
Seems many people who just showed up want it to fail. Fuck those people.
I remember a few users at Voat used to piss on Poal. And now Voat has gone. I really don't want Poal to go either.
I used to visit here with my old account and I'm fond of the bear.
On a "free speech" site this shouldn't be an issue. The sub moderator is free to choose whom they associate with, no?
On a "free speech" site this shouldn't be an issue.
Being banned? Depends on your definition of free speech. This is a very old argument that goes back to Voats early days.
The sub moderator is free to choose whom they associate with, no?
That depends on if you believe a sub is a mods private fiefdom or whether it belongs to the users.
It belongs to whom created it, obviously. Why would anything else be the case? If website owners want to allow others to own parts of their platform, then they should be hands off, or don't allow that, or have rules on what owning part of their site entails. I think that the sub owner (posession is 9/10ths law) is free to do whatever the fuck they want, unless the site has rules saying otherwise.
The people banned on poal are basically schizophrenic forum junkies that ruin the atmosphere and just shriek.
I lold when u/theoldones got banned here and I got unbanned on voat after he tried so hard to get me banned for pointing out when he was wrong, the sycophantic spaz wound embarrassing putt by pushing him into an unpopular and unneeded ban wave that caused his builders and the whole user base to flip on him.
I lold when u/theoldones got banned here and I got unbanned on voat after he tried so hard to get me banned for pointing out when he was wrong, the sycophantic spaz wound embarrassing putt by pushing him into an unpopular and unneeded ban wave that caused his builders and the whole user base to flip on him
Lol, I got banned in that ban wave. Theoldones is a massive cuck faggot. His life is probably over without preview voat.
He's rarely on the preview chat and doesn't stay long when he does show up.
Nah. You don't even get one. Sure you can talk about clones, but Aliens, GTFO. XD
(post is archived)