WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

937

I mean, look at this censorship happy faggot: https://poal.co/s/QStorm/sublog

I could understand spam being removed, but this list of bans and removals are legitimate posts.

I mean, look at this censorship happy faggot: https://poal.co/s/QStorm/sublog I could understand spam being removed, but this list of bans and removals are legitimate posts.

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

People dont brigade qstorm, qstorm gets a deluded post to the front page and then gets blown out by regular users.

And OP is generally correct; if the down vote button isn't a disagree button then the ban user button isn't a "super disagree button". Crensch is a petty tyrant that bans users for disagreeing with his deluded boomer userbase and exposing his grifting ass.

Banning him from moderation is justifiable but if the president is unpalatable shaming him for using liberal tactics to prop up his grift is genuinely the least that can be done. If you post a fact he doesn't like he bans you and now none of his users will believe truth because it was banned and they trust crensch's discretion because they are too stupid to reason for themselves.

Greatawakening ruined voat and created the dumbest purity spiral I've ever seen. He genuinely kept a subverse called myshitlist and organized his faithful to brigade users who irked him.

Besides all that he has a sub on the .win network, unless they already banned him off the site.

[–] 2 pts

if the down vote button isn't a disagree button then the ban user button isn't a "super disagree button"

This. Why host a Q sub here, if the sub can't handle free speech? Poal is a free speech forum.

[–] 1 pt

"muh noods."

I'll leave it at that.